Finding Leviathan in Hegel: The Private Rule of Law and its Limits

IF 0.8 2区哲学 Q3 ETHICS

Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1007/s10982-024-09497-1

Paul Gowder

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper uses Gerald Postema’s Law’s Rule to take up one of the most controversial questions in rule of law scholarship: whether the ideal can provide the basis for criticizing the state alone, or private individuals and entities exercising power over others as well. An account of the characteristics of states in virtue of which the rule of law licenses control over their power is developed, followed by an examination of some cases in which non-state holders of power over others might take on some of those characteristics. Under such circumstances, there are rule of law reasons to demand state control of private power.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在黑格尔中寻找利维坦：私法规则及其限制

本文利用杰拉尔德-波斯特马（Gerald Postema）的《法律的规则》（Law's Rule）来探讨法治学术中最具争议性的问题之一：法治理想能否为批评国家或对他人行使权力的私人和实体提供依据。本文阐述了国家的特征，法治正是凭借这些特征对其权力进行控制，随后考察了非国家权力拥有者对他人行使权力时可能具有的一些特征。在这种情况下，有法治理由要求国家控制私人权力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Law and Philosophy Multiple-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Law and Philosophy is a forum for the publication of work in law and philosophy which is of common interest to members of the two disciplines of jurisprudence and legal philosophy. It is open to all approaches in both fields and to work in any of the major legal traditions - common law, civil law, or the socialist tradition. The editors of Law and Philosophy encourage papers which exhibit philosophical reflection on the law informed by a knowledge of the law, and legal analysis informed by philosophical methods and principles.