Conceptualising and measuring consumer perceptions of brand wastefulness

IF 4 Q2 BUSINESS
Alexandria M. Gain, Leonard V. Coote, André Bonfrer
{"title":"Conceptualising and measuring consumer perceptions of brand wastefulness","authors":"Alexandria M. Gain, Leonard V. Coote, André Bonfrer","doi":"10.1057/s41262-024-00360-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consumers consider the wastefulness of brands and are predisposed to exhibit aversion to those perceived as wasteful. However, there is a lack of consensus on how consumers associate wastefulness with brands and how this impacts downstream consumer brand responses. Integrating conceptualisations in the literature with original consumers’ insights, we conceptualise consumer perceived brand wastefulness (CPBW) as a multidimensional construct comprising perceptions of (1) unnecessary consumption, (2) inefficient utilisation, and (3) tangible waste. A multi-phase scale development process validated a CPBW scale measuring each dimension. The scale distinguished between consumer perceptions of more vs less wasteful brands and demonstrated CPBW as conceptually distinct from perceptions of brands’ environmental friendliness and corporate social responsibility (CSR). CPBW was related to unfavourable consumer brand responses, including a reduced purchase likelihood, lower willingness to pay a price premium, negative self-conscious emotions, and lower perceptions of brand quality and credibility. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications and directions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Brand Management","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-024-00360-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumers consider the wastefulness of brands and are predisposed to exhibit aversion to those perceived as wasteful. However, there is a lack of consensus on how consumers associate wastefulness with brands and how this impacts downstream consumer brand responses. Integrating conceptualisations in the literature with original consumers’ insights, we conceptualise consumer perceived brand wastefulness (CPBW) as a multidimensional construct comprising perceptions of (1) unnecessary consumption, (2) inefficient utilisation, and (3) tangible waste. A multi-phase scale development process validated a CPBW scale measuring each dimension. The scale distinguished between consumer perceptions of more vs less wasteful brands and demonstrated CPBW as conceptually distinct from perceptions of brands’ environmental friendliness and corporate social responsibility (CSR). CPBW was related to unfavourable consumer brand responses, including a reduced purchase likelihood, lower willingness to pay a price premium, negative self-conscious emotions, and lower perceptions of brand quality and credibility. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications and directions for future research.

Abstract Image

消费者对品牌浪费认知的概念化和测量
消费者会考虑品牌的浪费性,并对那些被认为浪费的品牌产生反感。然而,对于消费者如何将浪费与品牌联系起来,以及这如何影响下游消费者对品牌的反应,还缺乏共识。结合文献中的概念和消费者的原始见解,我们将消费者感知到的品牌浪费(CPBW)概念化为一个多维结构,包括对(1)不必要消费、(2)低效利用和(3)有形浪费的感知。多阶段量表开发过程验证了衡量各维度的 CPBW 量表。该量表区分了消费者对浪费较多品牌和浪费较少品牌的看法,并证明了 CPBW 在概念上有别于对品牌环保性和企业社会责任(CSR)的看法。CPBW 与消费者对品牌的不利反应有关,包括购买可能性降低、支付溢价的意愿降低、负面的自我意识情绪以及对品牌质量和可信度的感知降低。我们讨论了其理论和管理意义以及未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original and insightful peer-reviewed articles as well as industry-based case studies plus invited expert commentaries and editorials which rigorously consider:models and theories effectively used in brand management research and practicehow the world's leading companies are managing their brandsthe latest thinking techniques and initiatives used by agencies and consultantscurrent case studies which explore leading organisations' practical experiences the problems faced and the lessons learnedapplied research from leading business schools research institutes and universitiesIf after reading the aims and scope you consider your article potentially relevant you may submit your work?for consideration as per the?normal process. The Journal Editors do not ordinarily discuss potential suitability of articles prior to submission.The Journal also regularly publishes themed special issues and is essential reading for brand strategists in both private and public sector organisations and academics in universities and business schools - including:Professors and LecturersMaster MBA and PhD studentsBrand ResearchersMarketing and Branding ConsultantsHeads of Branding Brand Directors and ManagersMarketing DirectorsBusiness Development ManagersHeads of Corporate CommunicationsCEOs and Managing DirectorsAgency DirectorsPlanning Directors and Strategic PlannersIP Lawyers and Patent AttorneysTopics covered include but are not limited to:Online or Digital BrandingBrand Metrics and/or AnalyticsLuxury BrandingBrand Ethics and/or Corporate Social ResponsibilityBrand and Finance Brand Reputation Identity and ImageBrand Relationship Loyalty or LoveBranding and TechnologyBranding Innovation and/or R&DBrand Valuation Integrated Brand CommunicationBrand ManagementBrand EquityBrand Community (Online)Product BrandingService BrandingBusiness-to-Business BrandingRetail BrandingPrivate Label Branding Brand Heritage and History Qualitative and Quantitative Brand ResearchBrand Architecture and PortfoliosBrand Alliances and MergersCorporate Brand ManagementBrand ExperienceBrand CrisesBrand CounterfeitsBrand and LawBrand Extension and Brand Growth Brand Credibility and TrustOpen Brand ManagementBrand Elements (Logo Naming Packaging etc.)Branding for Profit and Non-Profit OrganisationsBrand Co-creation Brand Research Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信