15 Discrepancies in Medication Usage and Lifestyle Modification Referrals in Metabolic Syndrome is Dependent on how the Syndrome is Coded: A TriNetX Study

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Annabelle N. Brinkerhoff, Jigar Gosalia, Juan J. Qiu, James A. Pawelczyk, David N. Proctor
{"title":"15 Discrepancies in Medication Usage and Lifestyle Modification Referrals in Metabolic Syndrome is Dependent on how the Syndrome is Coded: A TriNetX Study","authors":"Annabelle N. Brinkerhoff, Jigar Gosalia, Juan J. Qiu, James A. Pawelczyk, David N. Proctor","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: ICD-10 coding inconsistencies hinder timely recognition and treatment of metabolic syndrome (MetS), posing a significant risk for cardiometabolic disease progression. This study employed a digital phenotype for MetS and compared odds for medication and lifestyle intervention compared to those coded for MetS. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: MetS is a cluster of cardiometabolic risk factors that increase risk for numerous adverse clinical outcomes. Patients with MetS were identified through electronic medical records on TriNetX LLC using the standard ICD-10 code or through a digital phenotype, involving grouping codes for the individual components. Percentage of patients with MetS not captured with the standard code was identified. In addition, disparities in blood pressure, glucose, lipid-lowering medication, and lifestyle intervention between the coding schemas were assessed, shedding light on healthcare inequities and informing targeted interventions. Odds ratios (RR) were presented for all outcomes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Patient demographics and lab values were similar between the standard code and digital phenotype cohorts. Of the 4.3 million individuals aged 50 to 80 identified as having MetS using the digital phenotype in the TriNetX research network, only 1.78% of participants shared the standard code. Individuals with the digital phenotype for MetS were at lower odds in receiving glucose lowering medication (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.98–2.13, p <0.001) and exercise or nutrition-based intervention advice (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.55–1.96, p <0.001) after controlling for demographics and lab values for each MetS component. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This project utilized TriNetX to create a digital phenotype for MetS, and suggests most patients are not coded for it using the standard ICD-10 system. This is troublesome given those with the standard code are less likely to receive certain interventions.","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: ICD-10 coding inconsistencies hinder timely recognition and treatment of metabolic syndrome (MetS), posing a significant risk for cardiometabolic disease progression. This study employed a digital phenotype for MetS and compared odds for medication and lifestyle intervention compared to those coded for MetS. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: MetS is a cluster of cardiometabolic risk factors that increase risk for numerous adverse clinical outcomes. Patients with MetS were identified through electronic medical records on TriNetX LLC using the standard ICD-10 code or through a digital phenotype, involving grouping codes for the individual components. Percentage of patients with MetS not captured with the standard code was identified. In addition, disparities in blood pressure, glucose, lipid-lowering medication, and lifestyle intervention between the coding schemas were assessed, shedding light on healthcare inequities and informing targeted interventions. Odds ratios (RR) were presented for all outcomes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Patient demographics and lab values were similar between the standard code and digital phenotype cohorts. Of the 4.3 million individuals aged 50 to 80 identified as having MetS using the digital phenotype in the TriNetX research network, only 1.78% of participants shared the standard code. Individuals with the digital phenotype for MetS were at lower odds in receiving glucose lowering medication (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.98–2.13, p <0.001) and exercise or nutrition-based intervention advice (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.55–1.96, p <0.001) after controlling for demographics and lab values for each MetS component. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This project utilized TriNetX to create a digital phenotype for MetS, and suggests most patients are not coded for it using the standard ICD-10 system. This is troublesome given those with the standard code are less likely to receive certain interventions.
15 代谢综合征的药物使用和生活方式改变转诊中的差异取决于综合征的编码方式:TriNetX 研究
目的/目标:ICD-10 编码的不一致阻碍了对代谢综合征 (MetS) 的及时识别和治疗,给心脏代谢疾病的恶化带来了巨大风险。本研究采用了 MetS 数字表型,并比较了药物治疗和生活方式干预的几率与 MetS 编码的几率。方法/研究对象:MetS 是一组心脏代谢风险因素,会增加多种不良临床结果的风险。MetS 患者是通过 TriNetX LLC 上的电子病历,使用标准 ICD-10 编码或通过数字表型(包括各组成部分的分组编码)确定的。我们还确定了未使用标准代码的 MetS 患者比例。此外,还评估了编码模式之间在血压、血糖、降脂药物和生活方式干预方面的差异,从而揭示了医疗保健的不公平现象,并为有针对性的干预措施提供依据。所有结果的比值比(RR)均已列出。结果/预期结果:标准编码组群和数字表型组群的患者人口统计学特征和化验值相似。在 TriNetX 研究网络中使用数字表型确定的 430 万名 50 至 80 岁的 MetS 患者中,只有 1.78% 的参与者共享标准代码。在控制了MetS各组成部分的人口统计学和实验室值后,具有MetS数字表型的个体接受降糖药物(OR:2.11,95% CI:1.98-2.13,p <0.001)和运动或营养干预建议(OR:1.76,95% CI:1.55-1.96,p <0.001)的几率较低。讨论/意义:该项目利用 TriNetX 创建了 MetS 的数字表型,并表明大多数患者并未使用标准 ICD-10 系统进行编码。这很麻烦,因为有标准编码的患者不太可能接受某些干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信