Towards the conceptualization and the operationalization of the construct of talent management

IF 3.1 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Madduma Hewage Ruchira Sandeepanie, Prasadini Gamage, Gamage Dinoka Nimali Perera, Thuduwage Lasanthika Sajeewani
{"title":"Towards the conceptualization and the operationalization of the construct of talent management","authors":"Madduma Hewage Ruchira Sandeepanie, Prasadini Gamage, Gamage Dinoka Nimali Perera, Thuduwage Lasanthika Sajeewani","doi":"10.1108/mrr-03-2023-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of the paper is to afford a comprehensive conceptualization and operationalization of the construct of talent management through an inclusive exploration of conceptual clarifications for existing confusions while developing a complete measuring instrument.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The archival method was adopted together with a systematic review based on Khan <em>et al.</em>’s (2003) five steps of systematic literature review. The systematic review has encircled published research articles between 1982 and 2023 in the human resource management (HRM) arena. A total of 130 articles were initially scrutinized, and 106 were systematically reviewed to conceptualize, operationalize and explore clarifications for confusions and instrument development for talent management.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study explored conceptual clarifications for existing confusions towards talent management while recognizing definitions that come under the main philosophical schools for the underlying concept of talent. A novel practical definition has been established for talent management while recognizing dimensions, and then certain elements. A comprehensive instrument has been developed to measure talent management.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This study is limited to instrument development in measuring talent management; nevertheless, there is an enormous scope for using the instrument to empirically measure talent management through organizational and employees perspectives linked to diverse global contexts in future studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The developed comprehensive instrument is a vibrant contribution to future investigations related to empirically measuring talent management associated with organizational and employee perspectives related to diverse global contexts in winning “war for talent.” This study endows a significant input to the whole frame of HRM knowledge as it resolves existing conceptual ambiguities towards talent management while defining and operationalizing it.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47769,"journal":{"name":"Management Research Review","volume":"164 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-03-2023-0164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to afford a comprehensive conceptualization and operationalization of the construct of talent management through an inclusive exploration of conceptual clarifications for existing confusions while developing a complete measuring instrument.

Design/methodology/approach

The archival method was adopted together with a systematic review based on Khan et al.’s (2003) five steps of systematic literature review. The systematic review has encircled published research articles between 1982 and 2023 in the human resource management (HRM) arena. A total of 130 articles were initially scrutinized, and 106 were systematically reviewed to conceptualize, operationalize and explore clarifications for confusions and instrument development for talent management.

Findings

This study explored conceptual clarifications for existing confusions towards talent management while recognizing definitions that come under the main philosophical schools for the underlying concept of talent. A novel practical definition has been established for talent management while recognizing dimensions, and then certain elements. A comprehensive instrument has been developed to measure talent management.

Research limitations/implications

This study is limited to instrument development in measuring talent management; nevertheless, there is an enormous scope for using the instrument to empirically measure talent management through organizational and employees perspectives linked to diverse global contexts in future studies.

Originality/value

The developed comprehensive instrument is a vibrant contribution to future investigations related to empirically measuring talent management associated with organizational and employee perspectives related to diverse global contexts in winning “war for talent.” This study endows a significant input to the whole frame of HRM knowledge as it resolves existing conceptual ambiguities towards talent management while defining and operationalizing it.

实现人才管理概念化和可操作性
本文的目的是通过对现有混淆概念的澄清,同时开发一个完整的测量工具,对人才管理的概念进行全面的概念化和操作化。系统综述涵盖了 1982 年至 2023 年间人力资源管理(HRM)领域已发表的研究文章。初步审查了 130 篇文章,并对 106 篇文章进行了系统审查,以便对人才管理进行概念化、可操作化,并探索如何澄清人才管理中的困惑和开发相关工具。在确认各维度和某些要素的同时,还为人才管理确立了一个新颖实用的定义。研究局限性/影响本研究仅限于开发测量人才管理的工具;然而,在未来的研究中,通过与不同全球背景相关的组织和员工视角,使用该工具实证测量人才管理具有巨大的空间。这项研究为整个人力资源管理知识框架提供了重要的投入,因为它在定义和操作人才管理的同时,解决了现有的人才管理概念模糊问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Management Research Review publishes a wide variety of articles outlining the latest management research. We emphasize management implication from multiple disciplines. We welcome high quality empirical and theoretical studies, literature reviews, and articles with important tactical implications. Published 12 times a year, the journal prides itself on quick publication of the very latest research in general management. The key issues featured include: Business Ethics and Sustainability Corporate Finance Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management Industrial Relations Information and Knowledge Management International Business Human Resource Management Organizational Theory and Behaviour Production and Operations Management Strategic Management and Leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信