Evaluation of Vertical Misfit and Torque Loss of Different Abutments for Tri-Channel Type Internal Connection Dental Implants After Mechanical Cycling

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Julio Neto Souto Batista, Anselmo Agostinho Simionato, Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
{"title":"Evaluation of Vertical Misfit and Torque Loss of Different Abutments for Tri-Channel Type Internal Connection Dental Implants After Mechanical Cycling","authors":"Julio Neto Souto Batista, Anselmo Agostinho Simionato, Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-d-23-00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of UCLA and Mini-conical abutments for implants with Tri-channel connections regarding torque loss and vertical misfit. Twenty 3-element metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPD) supported by 2 implants were manufactured and divided into 2 groups (n = 10): UCLA (group 1) and Mini-conical Abutments (group 2). The evaluation of torque loss was carried out before and after mechanical cycling, while the vertical fit was evaluated throughout the different stages of manufacturing the prostheses, as well pre- and postcycling (300,000 cycles, 30 N). Statistical analyses of torque loss and vertical misfit were performed using the linear mixed effects model. Both groups showed torque loss after mechanical cycling (<em>P</em> &lt; .05); however, there was no significant percentage differences between them (<em>P</em> = .795). Before cycling, the groups showed a significant difference in terms of vertical misfit values (<em>P</em> &lt; .05); however, this difference was no long observed after cycling (<em>P</em> = .894). Both groups showed torque loss after the cycling test, with no significant difference (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). There was no significant difference in vertical misfit after mechanical cycling; however, in group 1 (UCLA) there was accommodation of the implant-UCLA abutment interface, while group 2 (Mini-conical abutment) did not show changes in the interface with the implant after the test. Both groups behaved similarly regarding the torque loss of the prosthesis retention screws pre- and postmechanical cycling, with greater loss after the test.</p>","PeriodicalId":50101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-23-00033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of UCLA and Mini-conical abutments for implants with Tri-channel connections regarding torque loss and vertical misfit. Twenty 3-element metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPD) supported by 2 implants were manufactured and divided into 2 groups (n = 10): UCLA (group 1) and Mini-conical Abutments (group 2). The evaluation of torque loss was carried out before and after mechanical cycling, while the vertical fit was evaluated throughout the different stages of manufacturing the prostheses, as well pre- and postcycling (300,000 cycles, 30 N). Statistical analyses of torque loss and vertical misfit were performed using the linear mixed effects model. Both groups showed torque loss after mechanical cycling (P < .05); however, there was no significant percentage differences between them (P = .795). Before cycling, the groups showed a significant difference in terms of vertical misfit values (P < .05); however, this difference was no long observed after cycling (P = .894). Both groups showed torque loss after the cycling test, with no significant difference (P > .05). There was no significant difference in vertical misfit after mechanical cycling; however, in group 1 (UCLA) there was accommodation of the implant-UCLA abutment interface, while group 2 (Mini-conical abutment) did not show changes in the interface with the implant after the test. Both groups behaved similarly regarding the torque loss of the prosthesis retention screws pre- and postmechanical cycling, with greater loss after the test.

机械循环后三通道型内连接种植体不同基台的垂直偏差和扭矩损失评估
这项研究的目的是评估 UCLA 和迷你锥形基台在三通道连接种植体上的扭力损失和垂直错位方面的机械性能。研究人员制作了 20 个由 2 个种植体支撑的三元素金属陶瓷固定局部义齿 (FPD),并将其分为两组(n = 10):UCLA(第 1 组)和迷你锥形基台(第 2 组)。扭力损失评估在机械循环前后进行,而垂直密合度评估则在义齿制造的不同阶段以及机械循环前后(30 万次循环,30 N)进行。使用线性混合效应模型对扭矩损失和垂直拟合度进行了统计分析。两组在机械循环后都出现了扭矩损失(P <.05),但两者之间的百分比差异不大(P = .795)。在循环之前,两组的垂直失配值存在显著差异(P < .05);但在循环之后,这种差异不再存在(P = .894)。两组在循环测试后都出现了扭矩损失,但差异不明显(P > .05)。机械循环测试后,两组的垂直错位没有明显差异;然而,在第一组(加州大学洛杉矶分校)中,种植体与加州大学洛杉矶分校基台的界面发生了适应性变化,而第二组(微型锥形基台)在测试后与种植体的界面没有发生变化。两组在机械循环前后的修复体固位螺丝扭力损失情况相似,测试后的损失更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Implantology
Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry and of the American Academy of Implant Prosthodontics, is dedicated to providing valuable information to general dentists, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists, scientists, clinicians, laboratory owners and technicians, manufacturers, and educators. Implant basics, prosthetics, pharmaceuticals, the latest research in implantology, implant surgery, and advanced implant procedures are just some of the topics covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信