Working Oneself Up and Universal Basic Income

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1017/s1369415424000153

Martin Sticker

引用次数: 0

Abstract

I respond to a challenge raised by Jordan Pascoe: Kant’s conception of obtaining full citizenship through working oneself up necessarily condemns some people to passive citizenship. I argue that we should not focus on work to establish universal full citizenship. Rather, a Universal Basic Income, an income paid regularly to everyone and without conditions, can secure everyone’s full citizenship. Moreover, I argue that such a scheme is more Kantian in nature than hitherto assumed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自力更生与全民基本收入

我对乔丹-帕斯科（Jordan Pascoe）提出的质疑做出回应：康德关于通过自身努力获得正式公民身份的概念必然会使一些人沦为被动的公民。我认为，我们不应该把重点放在通过工作来建立普遍的完全公民权上。相反，"全民基本收入"--一种无条件定期支付给每个人的收入--可以确保每个人的完全公民权。此外，我还认为，这种计划在本质上比迄今为止的假设更具康德色彩。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.