Fasting and digestion exert opposite effects on collective behavior in goldfish across contexts

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
L.-Q. Zeng, S.-J. Fu
{"title":"Fasting and digestion exert opposite effects on collective behavior in goldfish across contexts","authors":"L.-Q. Zeng,&nbsp;S.-J. Fu","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animal groups are often composed of individuals with differences in their phenotypes (e.g. body size, personality, or internal nutritional state). Such differences in phenotypes between group mates can have significant consequences for the collective movement and behavior of a group. Here, we examined the effects of nutritional state and ecological context on the individual- and group-level behaviors of groups of shoaling goldfish (<i>Carassius auratus</i>) across an open water environment, an environment with food, and an environment with food and refuge. Fish were randomly manipulated to be in one of three nutritional states (control: fasted for 24 h, fasting: fasted for 1 week, and digestion: 2 h after feeding) and comprised five group compositions: the all-control (6 control fish), all-fasting (6 fasted fish), all-digestion (6 digesting fish), mixed con–fas (3 control fish and 3 fasted fish), and mixed con–dig treatment (3 control fish and 3 digesting fish). We found that compared to the control and fasted treatments, the fish in the digestion treatment had lower individual swimming speeds and nearest neighbor distances. However, group polarization was lower in the fasted treatment than in both the control and digestion treatments. For the two mixed treatments, individual and collective behaviors of the fish seemed to be intermediate in comparison to those of either the fasted or digestion treatments. Moreover, group-level differences in collective behaviors were maintained across different contexts. All five treatments exhibited considerable context-associated changes in collective behaviors, but behavioral repeatability was dependent on the nutritional state of the group composition. Our results suggest that nutritional state and ecological context influence both individual and collective behaviors and that fasting and digestion exert opposite effects on collective behaviors across ecological contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"323 3","pages":"187-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal groups are often composed of individuals with differences in their phenotypes (e.g. body size, personality, or internal nutritional state). Such differences in phenotypes between group mates can have significant consequences for the collective movement and behavior of a group. Here, we examined the effects of nutritional state and ecological context on the individual- and group-level behaviors of groups of shoaling goldfish (Carassius auratus) across an open water environment, an environment with food, and an environment with food and refuge. Fish were randomly manipulated to be in one of three nutritional states (control: fasted for 24 h, fasting: fasted for 1 week, and digestion: 2 h after feeding) and comprised five group compositions: the all-control (6 control fish), all-fasting (6 fasted fish), all-digestion (6 digesting fish), mixed con–fas (3 control fish and 3 fasted fish), and mixed con–dig treatment (3 control fish and 3 digesting fish). We found that compared to the control and fasted treatments, the fish in the digestion treatment had lower individual swimming speeds and nearest neighbor distances. However, group polarization was lower in the fasted treatment than in both the control and digestion treatments. For the two mixed treatments, individual and collective behaviors of the fish seemed to be intermediate in comparison to those of either the fasted or digestion treatments. Moreover, group-level differences in collective behaviors were maintained across different contexts. All five treatments exhibited considerable context-associated changes in collective behaviors, but behavioral repeatability was dependent on the nutritional state of the group composition. Our results suggest that nutritional state and ecological context influence both individual and collective behaviors and that fasting and digestion exert opposite effects on collective behaviors across ecological contexts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

禁食和消化对不同环境下金鱼的集体行为产生相反的影响
动物群体通常由表型(如体型、性格或体内营养状况)不同的个体组成。群体伙伴之间的这种表型差异会对群体的集体运动和行为产生重大影响。在这里,我们研究了营养状态和生态环境对滩涂金鱼(Carassius auratus)群体在开放水域环境、有食物的环境以及有食物和避难所的环境中的个体和群体行为的影响。金鱼随机处于三种营养状态之一(对照组:禁食 24 小时;禁食组:禁食一周;消化组:喂食后 2 小时),并由五组组成:全对照组(6 条对照组金鱼)、全禁食组(6 条禁食组金鱼)、全消化组(6 条消化组金鱼)、混合全禁食组(3 条对照组金鱼和 3 条禁食组金鱼)以及混合全消化组(3 条对照组金鱼和 3 条消化组金鱼)。我们发现,与对照组和禁食处理相比,消化处理的鱼的个体游速和近邻距离较低。然而,与对照组和消化处理相比,禁食处理中的群体极化程度较低。在两种混合处理中,与禁食处理或消化处理相比,鱼类的个体和集体行为似乎处于中间水平。此外,集体行为的群体水平差异在不同的情境下都保持不变。所有五种处理的集体行为都表现出与环境相关的显著变化,但行为的可重复性取决于群体组成的营养状态。我们的研究结果表明,营养状态和生态环境对个体和集体行为都有影响,禁食和消化在不同生态环境下对集体行为的影响是相反的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信