Interest in and Experience with Genetic Testing for Late-Onset Medical Conditions: Results from the National Poll on Healthy Aging

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
S. J. Feldman, D. Blasco, M. Mones, J. Scott Roberts
{"title":"Interest in and Experience with Genetic Testing for Late-Onset Medical Conditions: Results from the National Poll on Healthy Aging","authors":"S. J. Feldman, D. Blasco, M. Mones, J. Scott Roberts","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2024.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The increasing availability of genetic testing for late-onset diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease necessitates understanding public perceptions and experiences of such testing among at-risk populations.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>To assess (a) prior uptake of genetic testing (both in medical and direct-to-consumer settings), (b) future interest in genetic testing for late-onset conditions (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease), and (c) perceptions of testing pros and cons among middle-to-older aged adults.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design</h3><p>Online, cross-sectional survey study.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Setting</h3><p>The National Poll on Healthy Aging at the University of Michigan is a recurring biannual survey of a nationally representative sample of adults aged 50–80. This study reports on a March 2018 fielding of the survey that included a genetic testing module administered to adults aged 50–64.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Participants</h3><p>Study participants were 991 community-dwelling adults aged 50–64.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Measurements</h3><p>Survey measures assessed (a) prior use of genetic testing, (b) reasons for engaging in genetic testing, (c) interest in different types of genetic testing, including for Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and macular degeneration, and (d) perceived benefits, risks, and limitations of testing.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Previous uptake of genetic testing was limited (medical use: 5.1%; direct-to-consumer: 10.8%), with direct-to-consumer test uptake higher among respondents with household incomes of $100,000 or more. Over half of adults endorsed interest in genetic testing for estimation of disease risk (58.9%), ancestry knowledge (58%), and informing medical care (53.8%). Interest in genetic testing for specific late-onset conditions was even higher, including Alzheimer’s disease (70%), Parkinson’s disease (65.3%), and macular degeneration (64.3%). Multivariable logistic regression models showed that older adults more likely to be interested in genetic testing for medical or disease risk purposes were those with higher levels of education (college degree or higher) and who endorsed the benefits of genetic testing, whereas respondents who endorsed testing risks and limitations were less likely to express interest.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>While prior use of genetic testing among the middle-to-older age population was low, interest in testing for Alzheimer’s disease and other late-onset conditions was high. This high interest may translate into increased uptake given expanded access to testing and recent treatment advances for Alzheimer’s disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The increasing availability of genetic testing for late-onset diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease necessitates understanding public perceptions and experiences of such testing among at-risk populations.

Objectives

To assess (a) prior uptake of genetic testing (both in medical and direct-to-consumer settings), (b) future interest in genetic testing for late-onset conditions (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease), and (c) perceptions of testing pros and cons among middle-to-older aged adults.

Design

Online, cross-sectional survey study.

Setting

The National Poll on Healthy Aging at the University of Michigan is a recurring biannual survey of a nationally representative sample of adults aged 50–80. This study reports on a March 2018 fielding of the survey that included a genetic testing module administered to adults aged 50–64.

Participants

Study participants were 991 community-dwelling adults aged 50–64.

Measurements

Survey measures assessed (a) prior use of genetic testing, (b) reasons for engaging in genetic testing, (c) interest in different types of genetic testing, including for Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and macular degeneration, and (d) perceived benefits, risks, and limitations of testing.

Results

Previous uptake of genetic testing was limited (medical use: 5.1%; direct-to-consumer: 10.8%), with direct-to-consumer test uptake higher among respondents with household incomes of $100,000 or more. Over half of adults endorsed interest in genetic testing for estimation of disease risk (58.9%), ancestry knowledge (58%), and informing medical care (53.8%). Interest in genetic testing for specific late-onset conditions was even higher, including Alzheimer’s disease (70%), Parkinson’s disease (65.3%), and macular degeneration (64.3%). Multivariable logistic regression models showed that older adults more likely to be interested in genetic testing for medical or disease risk purposes were those with higher levels of education (college degree or higher) and who endorsed the benefits of genetic testing, whereas respondents who endorsed testing risks and limitations were less likely to express interest.

Conclusion

While prior use of genetic testing among the middle-to-older age population was low, interest in testing for Alzheimer’s disease and other late-onset conditions was high. This high interest may translate into increased uptake given expanded access to testing and recent treatment advances for Alzheimer’s disease.

对晚期病症基因检测的兴趣和经验:全国健康老龄化民意调查结果
背景对阿尔茨海默病等晚发性疾病进行基因检测的机会越来越多,因此有必要了解公众对高危人群进行此类检测的看法和经历。目标评估(a)之前对基因检测的接受情况(包括医疗机构和直接面向消费者的机构),(b)未来对晚发疾病(如阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病)基因检测的兴趣,以及(c)中老年人对检测利弊的看法、设计在线横断面调查研究。背景密歇根大学的全国健康老龄化民意调查是一项针对 50-80 岁成年人的全国代表性抽样调查,每年进行两次。本研究报告了 2018 年 3 月的实地调查情况,其中包括对 50-64 岁成年人进行基因检测的模块.参与者研究参与者为 991 名居住在社区的 50-64 岁成年人。测量方法调查措施评估了(a) 以前使用基因检测的情况,(b) 进行基因检测的原因,(c) 对不同类型基因检测的兴趣,包括对阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病和黄斑变性的兴趣,以及(d) 感知到的检测益处、风险和局限性。结果以前接受基因检测的人数有限(医疗用途:5.1%;直接面向消费者:10.8%),家庭收入在 10 万美元或以上的受访者接受直接面向消费者检测的人数较多。超过半数的成年人表示有兴趣进行基因检测,以估计疾病风险(58.9%)、了解祖先(58%)和为医疗提供信息(53.8%)。对特定晚发疾病进行基因检测的兴趣更高,包括阿尔茨海默病(70%)、帕金森病(65.3%)和黄斑变性(64.3%)。多变量逻辑回归模型显示,教育程度较高(大学或以上学历)且认可基因检测益处的受访者更有可能对出于医疗或疾病风险目的的基因检测感兴趣,而认可检测风险和局限性的受访者则不太可能对基因检测感兴趣。鉴于检测机会的扩大和阿尔茨海默病治疗的最新进展,这种高兴趣可能会转化为更多的接受率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信