Development and validation of a Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ): A factor analysis and multivariate regression study

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Brian M. Doornenbal, Tim van Zutphen, Lise F. E. Beumeler, Rimke C. Vos, Mark Derks, Hinke Haisma, M. Elske van den Akker-van Marle, Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong
{"title":"Development and validation of a Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ): A factor analysis and multivariate regression study","authors":"Brian M. Doornenbal, Tim van Zutphen, Lise F. E. Beumeler, Rimke C. Vos, Mark Derks, Hinke Haisma, M. Elske van den Akker-van Marle, Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00718-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of Positive Health (PH) has gained increasing attention as a way of measuring individuals’ ability to adapt in the face of contextual challenges. However, a suitable measurement instrument for PH that encompasses contextual factors has not yet been developed. This paper responds to this need by developing a Context-specific Positive Health (CPH) measurement instrument that aligns with the Capability Approach (CA). The measurement instrument was developed and tested among a representative sample of 1002 Dutch internet survey panel members with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. The instrument was developed in two stages: a preparation phase consisting of focus groups and expert consultations, and a validation among a representative panel of Dutch citizens. The goal of the preparation phase, was to pilot test and refine previously proposed Positive Health questionnaires into an initial version of the CPHQ. The validation phase aimed to examine the initial CPHQ’s factorial validity using Factor Analysis, and its concurrent validity using Multivariate Regression Analysis. The developed questionnaire demonstrated adequate factorial and concurrent validity. Furthermore, it explicitly includes an assessment of resilience, this being a key component of PH. The introduced measurement tool, the CPHQ, comprises 11 dimensions that we have labeled as follows: relaxation, autonomy, fitness, perceived environmental safety, exclusion, social support, financial resources, political representation, health literacy, resilience, and enjoyment. In this article, we present four major contributions. Firstly, we embedded the measurement in a theoretical framework. Secondly, we focused the questionnaire on a key concept of Positive Health - the “ability to adapt.” Thirdly, we addressed issues of health inequality by considering contextual factors. Finally, we facilitated the development of more understandable measurement items.","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00718-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of Positive Health (PH) has gained increasing attention as a way of measuring individuals’ ability to adapt in the face of contextual challenges. However, a suitable measurement instrument for PH that encompasses contextual factors has not yet been developed. This paper responds to this need by developing a Context-specific Positive Health (CPH) measurement instrument that aligns with the Capability Approach (CA). The measurement instrument was developed and tested among a representative sample of 1002 Dutch internet survey panel members with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds. The instrument was developed in two stages: a preparation phase consisting of focus groups and expert consultations, and a validation among a representative panel of Dutch citizens. The goal of the preparation phase, was to pilot test and refine previously proposed Positive Health questionnaires into an initial version of the CPHQ. The validation phase aimed to examine the initial CPHQ’s factorial validity using Factor Analysis, and its concurrent validity using Multivariate Regression Analysis. The developed questionnaire demonstrated adequate factorial and concurrent validity. Furthermore, it explicitly includes an assessment of resilience, this being a key component of PH. The introduced measurement tool, the CPHQ, comprises 11 dimensions that we have labeled as follows: relaxation, autonomy, fitness, perceived environmental safety, exclusion, social support, financial resources, political representation, health literacy, resilience, and enjoyment. In this article, we present four major contributions. Firstly, we embedded the measurement in a theoretical framework. Secondly, we focused the questionnaire on a key concept of Positive Health - the “ability to adapt.” Thirdly, we addressed issues of health inequality by considering contextual factors. Finally, we facilitated the development of more understandable measurement items.
情境敏感型积极健康问卷(CPHQ)的开发与验证:因素分析和多元回归研究
积极健康(PH)的概念作为衡量个人面对环境挑战时的适应能力的一种方法,已受到越来越多的关注。然而,目前尚未开发出一种包含情境因素的合适的积极健康测量工具。本文针对这一需求,开发了与能力方法(Capability Approach,CA)相一致的特定情境积极健康(Context-specific Positive Health,CPH)测量工具。该测量工具由 1002 名具有不同社会人口背景的荷兰互联网调查小组成员的代表性样本开发和测试。该工具的开发分为两个阶段:由焦点小组和专家咨询组成的准备阶段,以及在具有代表性的荷兰公民小组中进行验证。准备阶段的目标是对之前提出的积极健康问卷进行试点测试,并将其完善为 CPHQ 的初始版本。验证阶段的目的是使用因子分析法检验 CPHQ 初版的因子有效性,并使用多元回归分析法检验其并发有效性。所开发的问卷具有充分的因子效度和并发效度。此外,它还明确包括对复原力的评估,而复原力是 PH 的一个关键组成部分。所引入的测量工具 CPHQ 包含 11 个维度,我们将其标记为:放松、自主、健康、环境安全感、排斥、社会支持、经济资源、政治代表、健康知识、复原力和愉悦。在本文中,我们做出了四大贡献。首先,我们将测量纳入了一个理论框架。其次,我们将问卷重点放在积极健康的一个关键概念--"适应能力 "上。第三,我们通过考虑环境因素来解决健康不平等问题。最后,我们促进了更易于理解的测量项目的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信