Machine learning based predictive modeling of readmissions following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation hospitalizations

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Jeffrey Balian , Sara Sakowitz MS, MPH , Arjun Verma BS , Amulya Vadlakonda BS , Emma Cruz , Konmal Ali , Peyman Benharash MD
{"title":"Machine learning based predictive modeling of readmissions following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation hospitalizations","authors":"Jeffrey Balian ,&nbsp;Sara Sakowitz MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Arjun Verma BS ,&nbsp;Amulya Vadlakonda BS ,&nbsp;Emma Cruz ,&nbsp;Konmal Ali ,&nbsp;Peyman Benharash MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite increasing utilization and survival benefit over the last decade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains resource-intensive with significant complications and rehospitalization risk. We thus utilized machine learning (ML) to develop prediction models for 90-day nonelective readmission following ECMO.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All adult patients receiving ECMO who survived index hospitalization were tabulated from the 2016–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models were developed to identify features associated with readmission following ECMO. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), mean Average Precision (mAP), and the Brier score were calculated to estimate model performance relative to logistic regression (LR). Shapley Additive Explanation summary (SHAP) plots evaluated the relative impact of each factor on the model. An additional sensitivity analysis solely included patient comorbidities and indication for ECMO as potential model covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of ∼22,947 patients, 4495 (19.6 %) were readmitted nonelectively within 90 days. The XGBoost model exhibited superior discrimination (AUROC 0.64 vs 0.49), classification accuracy (mAP 0.30 vs 0.20) and calibration (Brier score 0.154 vs 0.165, all P &lt; 0.001) in predicting readmission compared to LR. SHAP plots identified duration of index hospitalization, undergoing heart/lung transplantation, and Medicare insurance to be associated with increased odds of readmission. Upon sub-analysis, XGBoost demonstrated superior disclination compared to LR (AUROC 0.61 vs 0.60, P &lt; 0.05). Chronic liver disease and frailty were linked with increased odds of nonelective readmission.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ML outperformed LR in predicting readmission following ECMO. Future work is needed to identify other factors linked with readmission and further optimize post-ECMO care among this cohort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 125-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000538/pdfft?md5=b16fabd665e514f87c6396c48ad4addd&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000538-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite increasing utilization and survival benefit over the last decade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains resource-intensive with significant complications and rehospitalization risk. We thus utilized machine learning (ML) to develop prediction models for 90-day nonelective readmission following ECMO.

Methods

All adult patients receiving ECMO who survived index hospitalization were tabulated from the 2016–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models were developed to identify features associated with readmission following ECMO. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), mean Average Precision (mAP), and the Brier score were calculated to estimate model performance relative to logistic regression (LR). Shapley Additive Explanation summary (SHAP) plots evaluated the relative impact of each factor on the model. An additional sensitivity analysis solely included patient comorbidities and indication for ECMO as potential model covariates.

Results

Of ∼22,947 patients, 4495 (19.6 %) were readmitted nonelectively within 90 days. The XGBoost model exhibited superior discrimination (AUROC 0.64 vs 0.49), classification accuracy (mAP 0.30 vs 0.20) and calibration (Brier score 0.154 vs 0.165, all P < 0.001) in predicting readmission compared to LR. SHAP plots identified duration of index hospitalization, undergoing heart/lung transplantation, and Medicare insurance to be associated with increased odds of readmission. Upon sub-analysis, XGBoost demonstrated superior disclination compared to LR (AUROC 0.61 vs 0.60, P < 0.05). Chronic liver disease and frailty were linked with increased odds of nonelective readmission.

Conclusions

ML outperformed LR in predicting readmission following ECMO. Future work is needed to identify other factors linked with readmission and further optimize post-ECMO care among this cohort.

基于机器学习的体外膜肺氧合术后再住院预测模型
背景尽管在过去十年中,体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的使用率和存活率不断提高,但它仍然是一种资源密集型治疗,具有显著的并发症和再住院风险。因此,我们利用机器学习(ML)开发了ECMO术后90天非选择性再入院的预测模型。方法从2016-2020年全国再入院数据库中统计了所有接受ECMO且在指数住院中存活的成年患者。开发了极端梯度提升(XGBoost)模型,以确定与 ECMO 后再入院相关的特征。计算了接受者操作特征下面积(AUROC)、平均精度(mAP)和布赖尔评分,以估计模型相对于逻辑回归(LR)的性能。Shapley Additive Explanation summary (SHAP) 图评估了各因素对模型的相对影响。结果 在 22947 名患者中,有 4495 人(19.6%)在 90 天内再次非选择性入院。与 LR 相比,XGBoost 模型在预测再入院方面表现出更高的区分度(AUROC 0.64 vs 0.49)、分类准确性(mAP 0.30 vs 0.20)和校准性(Brier score 0.154 vs 0.165,所有 P < 0.001)。SHAP 图显示,指数住院时间、接受心肺移植手术和医疗保险与再入院几率增加有关。经过子分析,XGBoost 与 LR 相比,显示出更优越的预测能力(AUROC 0.61 vs 0.60,P < 0.05)。慢性肝病和体弱与非选择性再入院的几率增加有关。未来需要开展工作,确定与再入院相关的其他因素,并进一步优化该人群的 ECMO 术后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信