Bridging the urban-digital divide: Crowdfunding as an online middleground space

Q1 Social Sciences
Carolina Dalla Chiesa , Anders Rykkja
{"title":"Bridging the urban-digital divide: Crowdfunding as an online middleground space","authors":"Carolina Dalla Chiesa ,&nbsp;Anders Rykkja","doi":"10.1016/j.ccs.2024.100580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper attempts to provide a critique of the premise of territoriality in creative cities. A validated hypothesis in the literature on economic geography is that the density and “territoriality” of members of the so-called \"creative class\" influence the volume of creative goods and services produced in cities. This hypothesis gave rise to several sub-related themes, such as the premise that cities are, par excellence, a place where middleground spaces emerge because of place-based activities located in close-knit communities imbued with creativity and innovation commons. In line with this argument, recent studies have yielded an analytic framework to explain the dissemination of creativity through the so-called “middleground” spaces in cities: places, spaces, projects, and events. This framework presupposes the dissemination of creativity from the physical place to a cognitively constructed space. We revise this argument by suggesting that post-digitalized forms of creation and dissemination of knowledge often blur the boundaries between place and space (which we characterize in this paper as domains of “the local” and “the digital”). By mediating creativity through digital platforms, agents are also capable of outreaching different localities and creating ties that are not subsumed to close-knit communities. As such, our framework incorporates a “digital middleground” space into this existing “middleground” framework, thereby extending the scope of creativity in cities to digitally dispersed forms of exchange. We theorize that contemporary forms of creativity unfold openly, virtually, and non-hierarchically yet are imbued by local concerns such as the ones channeled by crowdfunding communities, which we use as an example in our discussions. Our paper contributes to a better understanding of the increasingly digitalized “urban” spaces and the impossibility of pursuing a dichotomous digital-local divide. We expect that scholars will consider the possibility for creativity to manifest not only in territorial-based middlegrounds, but also in online communities where creativity unfolds dispersedly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39061,"journal":{"name":"City, Culture and Society","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100580"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916624000158/pdfft?md5=6ff2c05c82f96d67e7ae5b13b22312f4&pid=1-s2.0-S1877916624000158-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916624000158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper attempts to provide a critique of the premise of territoriality in creative cities. A validated hypothesis in the literature on economic geography is that the density and “territoriality” of members of the so-called "creative class" influence the volume of creative goods and services produced in cities. This hypothesis gave rise to several sub-related themes, such as the premise that cities are, par excellence, a place where middleground spaces emerge because of place-based activities located in close-knit communities imbued with creativity and innovation commons. In line with this argument, recent studies have yielded an analytic framework to explain the dissemination of creativity through the so-called “middleground” spaces in cities: places, spaces, projects, and events. This framework presupposes the dissemination of creativity from the physical place to a cognitively constructed space. We revise this argument by suggesting that post-digitalized forms of creation and dissemination of knowledge often blur the boundaries between place and space (which we characterize in this paper as domains of “the local” and “the digital”). By mediating creativity through digital platforms, agents are also capable of outreaching different localities and creating ties that are not subsumed to close-knit communities. As such, our framework incorporates a “digital middleground” space into this existing “middleground” framework, thereby extending the scope of creativity in cities to digitally dispersed forms of exchange. We theorize that contemporary forms of creativity unfold openly, virtually, and non-hierarchically yet are imbued by local concerns such as the ones channeled by crowdfunding communities, which we use as an example in our discussions. Our paper contributes to a better understanding of the increasingly digitalized “urban” spaces and the impossibility of pursuing a dichotomous digital-local divide. We expect that scholars will consider the possibility for creativity to manifest not only in territorial-based middlegrounds, but also in online communities where creativity unfolds dispersedly.

弥合城市与数字之间的鸿沟:众筹作为在线中间空间
本文试图对创意城市的地域性前提进行批判。经济地理学文献中的一个有效假设是,所谓 "创意阶层 "成员的密度和 "地域性 "会影响城市中创意产品和服务的生产量。这一假说衍生出多个相关主题,如城市是一个卓越的中间空间,因为在充满创造力和创新公地的紧密社区中,以地方为基础的活动层出不穷。根据这一论点,最近的研究提出了一个分析框架,用以解释城市中所谓的 "中间地带 "空间--场所、空间、项目和活动--如何传播创造力。这一框架的前提是创意从物理空间传播到认知建构空间。我们对这一论点进行了修正,认为后数字化形式的知识创造和传播往往模糊了地点和空间(我们在本文中将其描述为 "本地 "和 "数字 "领域)之间的界限。通过数字平台对创造力进行中介,代理人也能够深入到不同的地方,并建立起不局限于紧密社区的联系。因此,我们的框架在现有的 "中间地带 "框架中加入了 "数字中间地带 "空间,从而将城市创意的范围扩展到数字分散的交流形式。我们认为,当代形式的创造力是公开的、虚拟的、无等级的,但又充满了地方性的关注,比如我们在讨论中以众筹社区为例。我们的论文有助于更好地理解日益数字化的 "城市 "空间,以及追求数字-地方二分法的不可能性。我们希望学者们能考虑到创造力不仅体现在基于地域的中间地带,也体现在创造力分散展开的网络社区中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
City, Culture and Society
City, Culture and Society Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信