Use of current automatic smoke evacuation system in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy: Its feasibility and potential usefulness

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1002/deo2.367
Yohei Nose, Motohiko Kato, Shoma Aoyagi, Kazunori Akeo, Kotaro Yamashita, Takuro Saito, Koji Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Tomoki Makino, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki, Kiyokazu Nakajima
{"title":"Use of current automatic smoke evacuation system in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy: Its feasibility and potential usefulness","authors":"Yohei Nose,&nbsp;Motohiko Kato,&nbsp;Shoma Aoyagi,&nbsp;Kazunori Akeo,&nbsp;Kotaro Yamashita,&nbsp;Takuro Saito,&nbsp;Koji Tanaka,&nbsp;Kazuyoshi Yamamoto,&nbsp;Tomoki Makino,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Takahashi,&nbsp;Yukinori Kurokawa,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Eguchi,&nbsp;Yuichiro Doki,&nbsp;Kiyokazu Nakajima","doi":"10.1002/deo2.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Flexible endoscopy does not have a system that can automatically evacuate surgical smoke generated in the gastrointestinal lumen. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential usefulness of automatic smoke evacuation systems in flexible endoscopy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>[Bench] After surgical smoke generated in the stomach was evacuated by the evacuator, the degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were evaluated to optimize the evacuator settings. [Animal] Insufflation, suction, and total operation time to complete the protocol of 10 cauterizations of the gastric mucosa were measured in three groups: “manual suction only,” “manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force),” and “manual suction with automatic evacuation (70% force).” The stability of endoscopic visualization and operability was evaluated by 10 endoscopists blinded to those suction settings, and the number of manual suctions, insufflations, and total operation time were measured.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>[Bench] The degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were inversely correlated. [Animal] When the automatic evacuator was partially used, there was no difference in the insufflation time, but the suction time (vs 50%; <i>p</i> = 0.011, vs. 70%; <i>p</i> = 0.011) and total operation time (vs. 50%; <i>p</i> = 0.012, vs. 70%; <i>p</i> = 0.036) were significantly reduced compared to manual operation only. Furthermore, manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force) significantly improved the stability of endoscopic visualization and operability compared to manual operation only (<i>p</i> = 0.041, <i>p</i> = 0.0085).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The automatic smoke evacuation in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy was potentially feasible and useful by improving the device setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.367","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Flexible endoscopy does not have a system that can automatically evacuate surgical smoke generated in the gastrointestinal lumen. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential usefulness of automatic smoke evacuation systems in flexible endoscopy.

Methods

[Bench] After surgical smoke generated in the stomach was evacuated by the evacuator, the degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were evaluated to optimize the evacuator settings. [Animal] Insufflation, suction, and total operation time to complete the protocol of 10 cauterizations of the gastric mucosa were measured in three groups: “manual suction only,” “manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force),” and “manual suction with automatic evacuation (70% force).” The stability of endoscopic visualization and operability was evaluated by 10 endoscopists blinded to those suction settings, and the number of manual suctions, insufflations, and total operation time were measured.

Results

[Bench] The degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were inversely correlated. [Animal] When the automatic evacuator was partially used, there was no difference in the insufflation time, but the suction time (vs 50%; p = 0.011, vs. 70%; p = 0.011) and total operation time (vs. 50%; p = 0.012, vs. 70%; p = 0.036) were significantly reduced compared to manual operation only. Furthermore, manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force) significantly improved the stability of endoscopic visualization and operability compared to manual operation only (p = 0.041, p = 0.0085).

Conclusions

The automatic smoke evacuation in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy was potentially feasible and useful by improving the device setting.

Abstract Image

在柔性消化道内窥镜检查中使用当前的自动排烟系统:其可行性和潜在用途
目的 柔性内窥镜检查没有能自动排出胃肠腔内产生的手术烟雾的系统。我们旨在研究在柔性内窥镜检查中使用自动排烟系统的可行性和潜在作用。 方法 [实验室] 在胃内产生的手术烟雾被排烟器排出后,对残留烟雾和胃腔塌陷程度进行评估,以优化排烟器的设置。[动物] 分三组测量抽气、抽吸和完成 10 次胃黏膜烧灼的总操作时间:"仅手动抽吸"、"手动抽吸加自动排空(50% 力)"和 "手动抽吸加自动排空(70% 力)"。由 10 名内镜医师对这些抽吸设置进行盲法评估,并测量手动抽吸次数、充气次数和总手术时间,以确定内镜可视性和可操作性的稳定性。 结果 [板凳] 残余烟雾的程度与胃腔塌陷程度成反比。[动物] 部分使用自动排空器时,充气时间没有差异,但抽吸时间(与 50%相比;p = 0.011,与 70%相比;p = 0.011)和总操作时间(与 50%相比;p = 0.012,与 70%相比;p = 0.036)比仅手动操作显著缩短。此外,与仅手动操作相比,手动抽吸加自动排烟(50% 力)可明显改善内镜观察的稳定性和可操作性(p = 0.041,p = 0.0085)。 结论 通过改进设备设置,在柔性胃肠道内窥镜检查中进行自动排烟具有潜在的可行性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信