The effects of anti-TNF-α biologics on insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An update systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.3 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Wei Shyann Lim , Seth En Teoh , Ansel Shao Pin Tang , Beatrice Jia Min Tan , Jasmine Yiling Lee , Chun En Yau , Julian Thumboo , Qin Xiang Ng
{"title":"The effects of anti-TNF-α biologics on insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An update systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Wei Shyann Lim ,&nbsp;Seth En Teoh ,&nbsp;Ansel Shao Pin Tang ,&nbsp;Beatrice Jia Min Tan ,&nbsp;Jasmine Yiling Lee ,&nbsp;Chun En Yau ,&nbsp;Julian Thumboo ,&nbsp;Qin Xiang Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim</h3><p>Increasing evidence demonstrates a link between the chronic inflammatory state in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the development of insulin resistance. It is thought that <em>anti</em>-TNF-α biologic therapy may improve insulin sensitivity and ameliorate insulin resistance by the downregulation of inflammatory cytokines, however, pre-clinical and clinical studies have yielded conflicting results. A meta-analysis on this topic is necessary to summarize current evidence and generate hypotheses for future research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Literature search was performed in four databases, namely PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library, from inception till April 9, 2023, querying studies reporting peripheral insulin resistance with and without <em>anti</em>-TNF-α use in patients with RA. Peripheral insulin resistance or sensitivity was quantified by the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA) index or the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) respectively. The difference in insulin resistance or sensitivity between the treatment and control group was calculated using standardized mean difference (SMD) for the purposes of the meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve articles were reviewed, with 10 longitudinal studies with a total of 297 patients included in the meta-analysis. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) from baseline HOMA was −0.82 (95% CI: −1.38 to −0.25) suggesting significant beneficial effects of <em>anti</em>-TNF-α therapy on insulin resistance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Current evidence supports the significant clinical efficacy of <em>anti</em>-TNF-α biologics in alleviating insulin resistance and improving insulin sensitivity in patients with active RA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124000626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim

Increasing evidence demonstrates a link between the chronic inflammatory state in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the development of insulin resistance. It is thought that anti-TNF-α biologic therapy may improve insulin sensitivity and ameliorate insulin resistance by the downregulation of inflammatory cytokines, however, pre-clinical and clinical studies have yielded conflicting results. A meta-analysis on this topic is necessary to summarize current evidence and generate hypotheses for future research.

Methods

Literature search was performed in four databases, namely PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library, from inception till April 9, 2023, querying studies reporting peripheral insulin resistance with and without anti-TNF-α use in patients with RA. Peripheral insulin resistance or sensitivity was quantified by the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA) index or the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) respectively. The difference in insulin resistance or sensitivity between the treatment and control group was calculated using standardized mean difference (SMD) for the purposes of the meta-analysis.

Results

Twelve articles were reviewed, with 10 longitudinal studies with a total of 297 patients included in the meta-analysis. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) from baseline HOMA was −0.82 (95% CI: −1.38 to −0.25) suggesting significant beneficial effects of anti-TNF-α therapy on insulin resistance.

Conclusion

Current evidence supports the significant clinical efficacy of anti-TNF-α biologics in alleviating insulin resistance and improving insulin sensitivity in patients with active RA.

抗肿瘤坏死因子-α生物制剂对类风湿性关节炎患者胰岛素抵抗和胰岛素敏感性的影响:最新系统综述和荟萃分析
背景和目的越来越多的证据表明,类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的慢性炎症状态与胰岛素抵抗之间存在联系。人们认为,抗肿瘤坏死因子-α生物疗法可通过下调炎症细胞因子来改善胰岛素敏感性并减轻胰岛素抵抗,但临床前和临床研究的结果却相互矛盾。方法从开始到 2023 年 4 月 9 日,在 PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆等四个数据库中进行文献检索,查询报告 RA 患者使用或未使用抗肿瘤坏死因子-α 的外周胰岛素抵抗的研究。外周胰岛素抵抗或敏感性分别通过胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA)指数或胰岛素敏感性定量检查指数(QUICKI)进行量化。为了进行荟萃分析,采用标准化平均差(SMD)计算治疗组和对照组之间胰岛素抵抗或胰岛素敏感性的差异。与基线HOMA相比,汇总的标准化均值差(SMD)为-0.82(95% CI:-1.38至-0.25),表明抗TNF-α治疗对胰岛素抵抗有显著的益处。结论目前的证据支持抗TNF-α生物制剂对缓解活动性RA患者的胰岛素抵抗和改善胰岛素敏感性有显著的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care. Types of Publications: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信