{"title":"The system of criteria for the choice of spelling in diachronic descriptive spelling","authors":"V. Kaverina","doi":"10.25136/2409-8698.2024.1.69588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article presents the methodology of research in the field of descriptive diachronic spelling. The aim of the work is to develop a system of criteria for choosing spelling variants at different stages of the formation of the studied orthogram. The need for such a system is justified both by the description of the diachronic analysis process and by a specific example of such an analysis. Special attention is paid to the disclosure of such important concepts for the theory of writing as \"usage\", \"norm\", \"codification\" and the relationship between these concepts. Special attention is paid to the question of the legality of the use of the term \"customary norm\", for which the arguments confirming the incorrectness of this term are considered in detail. In addition, the problems of correlation between the principles of spelling as tools of descriptive (descriptive) spelling and the rules as a result of the activities of orthologists codifying the norms of writing are discussed. The system of criteria for descriptive spelling is based on the system of rules of prescriptive spelling, namely the rules of modern spelling from the new electronic resource \"Spelling commentary of the Russian Dictionary\" (OROSS) by E. V. Beshenkova, O. E. Ivanova, E. V. Tenkova. The novelty of the results obtained in the article is due to the lack of research methodology in the field of descriptive diachronic spelling. The paper reveals such important concepts for the theory of writing as \"usage\", \"norm\", \"codification\" and clarifies the relationship between these concepts. As a result, the illegality of the use of the term \"customary norm\" was established, for which the arguments confirming the incorrectness of this term were considered in detail, in particular, that in certain contexts the terms \"usage\" and \"norm\" can be used indifferently. The result of the work was a system of criteria for choosing spelling options at different stages of the formation of the orthogram. The development of an original system of criteria for choosing spelling variants was carried out on the basis of a modern set of spelling rules. The scope of the research results is determined by describing the process of diachronic analysis of the orthogram and illustrated by a specific example of such analysis.\n","PeriodicalId":506782,"journal":{"name":"Litera","volume":"87 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2024.1.69588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article presents the methodology of research in the field of descriptive diachronic spelling. The aim of the work is to develop a system of criteria for choosing spelling variants at different stages of the formation of the studied orthogram. The need for such a system is justified both by the description of the diachronic analysis process and by a specific example of such an analysis. Special attention is paid to the disclosure of such important concepts for the theory of writing as "usage", "norm", "codification" and the relationship between these concepts. Special attention is paid to the question of the legality of the use of the term "customary norm", for which the arguments confirming the incorrectness of this term are considered in detail. In addition, the problems of correlation between the principles of spelling as tools of descriptive (descriptive) spelling and the rules as a result of the activities of orthologists codifying the norms of writing are discussed. The system of criteria for descriptive spelling is based on the system of rules of prescriptive spelling, namely the rules of modern spelling from the new electronic resource "Spelling commentary of the Russian Dictionary" (OROSS) by E. V. Beshenkova, O. E. Ivanova, E. V. Tenkova. The novelty of the results obtained in the article is due to the lack of research methodology in the field of descriptive diachronic spelling. The paper reveals such important concepts for the theory of writing as "usage", "norm", "codification" and clarifies the relationship between these concepts. As a result, the illegality of the use of the term "customary norm" was established, for which the arguments confirming the incorrectness of this term were considered in detail, in particular, that in certain contexts the terms "usage" and "norm" can be used indifferently. The result of the work was a system of criteria for choosing spelling options at different stages of the formation of the orthogram. The development of an original system of criteria for choosing spelling variants was carried out on the basis of a modern set of spelling rules. The scope of the research results is determined by describing the process of diachronic analysis of the orthogram and illustrated by a specific example of such analysis.
文章介绍了描述性异时拼写领域的研究方法。这项工作的目的是制定一套标准,用于在所研究的正字法形成的不同阶段选择拼写变体。通过对二时分析过程的描述和一个具体的二时分析实例,证明了这种系统的必要性。特别注意揭示 "用法"、"规范"、"编纂 "等写作理论的重要概念以及这些概念之间的关系。特别关注了使用 "习惯规范 "一词的合法性问题,并详细讨论了证实该词不正确的论据。此外,还讨论了作为描述性(描述性)拼写工具的拼写原则与作为正字法专家编纂写作规范活动成果的规则之间的关联问题。描述性拼写标准体系的基础是规定性拼写规则体系,即 E. V. Beshenkova、O. E. Ivanova、E. V. Tenkova 所著新电子资源《俄语词典拼写评注》(OROSS)中的现代拼写规则。文章所获成果的新颖性在于描述性异时拼写领域缺乏研究方法。本文揭示了 "用法"、"规范"、"编纂 "等写作理论的重要概念,并阐明了这些概念之间的关系。因此,本文确定了使用 "习惯规范 "一词的非法性,并详细考虑了证实该词不正确的论据,特别是在某些情况下,"用法 "和 "规范 "这两个词可以无区别地使用。这项工作的成果是建立了一套标准体系,用于在正字法形成的不同阶段选择拼写方案。在一套现代拼写规则的基础上,开发了一套独创的拼写变体选择标准系统。研究成果的范围是通过描述正字法的非同步分析过程来确定的,并通过这种分析的一个具体例子加以说明。