LEGAL VALIDITY OF NOTARIAL DEEDS SIGNED WITH ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE

Wanda Fabiola Emeralda Girsang, Kurniawan Kurniawan, Lalu Muhammad Hayyanul Haq
{"title":"LEGAL VALIDITY OF NOTARIAL DEEDS SIGNED WITH ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE","authors":"Wanda Fabiola Emeralda Girsang, Kurniawan Kurniawan, Lalu Muhammad Hayyanul Haq","doi":"10.55047/polri.v3i1.927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the profession of Notary holds significant importance in the economic landscape of Indonesia. However, there is a lack of legislation that enables Notaries to execute their duties by creating electronically signable deeds. In Indonesia, an authentic deed prepared by a Notary necessitates physical presence and cannot be executed electronically. This research seeks to identify the legal validity of notarial deeds signed with Electronic Signatures, particularly in Indonesia and New South Wales, Australia. The study aims to understand the regulatory frameworks, examine the nature of Electronic Signatures, and evaluate the implications for contract law in both jurisdictions. Utilizing a Normative Research approach, this study employs the Statute, Conceptual, and Comparative Approaches. Primary legal materials include relevant Indonesian and Australian laws, while secondary and tertiary legal materials provide additional context. A literature review involving books, e-journals, and internet sources contributes to the analysis. The research reveals a gap in explicit regulations governing electronically signed deeds in both Australia and Indonesia. Despite practical application in public contracts, especially in business collaborations, concerns about vulnerability to forgery persist. The absence of clear regulations necessitates a physical appearance before a notary for authentic deeds. The study concludes that regulatory models addressing protection, implementation, and supervision of electronically signed deeds should be explored collaboratively by the Government and the House of Representatives in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":499977,"journal":{"name":"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i1.927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, the profession of Notary holds significant importance in the economic landscape of Indonesia. However, there is a lack of legislation that enables Notaries to execute their duties by creating electronically signable deeds. In Indonesia, an authentic deed prepared by a Notary necessitates physical presence and cannot be executed electronically. This research seeks to identify the legal validity of notarial deeds signed with Electronic Signatures, particularly in Indonesia and New South Wales, Australia. The study aims to understand the regulatory frameworks, examine the nature of Electronic Signatures, and evaluate the implications for contract law in both jurisdictions. Utilizing a Normative Research approach, this study employs the Statute, Conceptual, and Comparative Approaches. Primary legal materials include relevant Indonesian and Australian laws, while secondary and tertiary legal materials provide additional context. A literature review involving books, e-journals, and internet sources contributes to the analysis. The research reveals a gap in explicit regulations governing electronically signed deeds in both Australia and Indonesia. Despite practical application in public contracts, especially in business collaborations, concerns about vulnerability to forgery persist. The absence of clear regulations necessitates a physical appearance before a notary for authentic deeds. The study concludes that regulatory models addressing protection, implementation, and supervision of electronically signed deeds should be explored collaboratively by the Government and the House of Representatives in Indonesia.
用电子签名签署的公证书的法律效力
目前,公证行业在印尼的经济格局中占有重要地位。然而,印尼缺乏使公证人能够通过创建可电子签名的契约来履行其职责的法律。在印尼,由公证人准备的真实契约需要公证人亲自到场,不能以电子方式执行。本研究旨在确定使用电子签名签署的公证契约的法律效力,尤其是在印度尼西亚和澳大利亚新南威尔士州。研究旨在了解这两个司法管辖区的监管框架,审查电子签名的性质,并评估其对合同法的影响。本研究采用了规范研究法、概念研究法和比较研究法。主要法律材料包括印尼和澳大利亚的相关法律,而第二和第三法律材料则提供了额外的背景。文献综述包括书籍、电子期刊和互联网资料,有助于分析。研究揭示了澳大利亚和印尼在电子签署契约方面的明确法规空白。尽管电子签名在公共合同,尤其是商业合作中得到了实际应用,但人们仍然担心电子签名容易被伪造。由于缺乏明确的法规,要获得真实的契约,必须亲自到公证处进行公证。本研究的结论是,印尼政府和众议院应共同探索监管模式,解决电子签署契约的保护、实施和监督问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信