Actual Problems of the Application of Bankruptcy Legislation in Courts of General Jurisdiction

I. Tsindeliani, E. V. Bezikova, Artem V. Shitkov
{"title":"Actual Problems of the Application of Bankruptcy Legislation in Courts of General Jurisdiction","authors":"I. Tsindeliani, E. V. Bezikova, Artem V. Shitkov","doi":"10.37399/issn2072-909x.2024.2.30-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study seems relevant because there is no uniform practice for certain categories of disputes related to the bankruptcy of individuals. The main purpose of this scientific article is to determine the features and current state of consideration of the analyzed category of disputes, identify current problems, and develop proposals for their resolution. The achievement of this goal is realized mainly through the solution of such tasks as the study of current legislation, the practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the established judicial practice of courts of general jurisdiction, as well as arbitration courts. On the basis of general scientific and private scientific (comparative legal, technical-legal, formal-logical) methods used in this study, judicial conflicts and practice were analyzed, issues requiring legal solutions were identified, measures aimed at improving the current legislation were proposed. As a result, it will become obvious that the main issues on which such disputes arise are procedural in nature. The results of the study indicate the need to detail the legal norms on the jurisdiction of cases in the division of jointly acquired property of spouses, one of whom is bankrupt; jurisdiction of cases related to non-competitive contesting of transactions; jurisdiction of cases involving subsidiary liability when an organization is excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities administratively.","PeriodicalId":513966,"journal":{"name":"Rossijskoe pravosudie","volume":"26 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossijskoe pravosudie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2024.2.30-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study seems relevant because there is no uniform practice for certain categories of disputes related to the bankruptcy of individuals. The main purpose of this scientific article is to determine the features and current state of consideration of the analyzed category of disputes, identify current problems, and develop proposals for their resolution. The achievement of this goal is realized mainly through the solution of such tasks as the study of current legislation, the practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the established judicial practice of courts of general jurisdiction, as well as arbitration courts. On the basis of general scientific and private scientific (comparative legal, technical-legal, formal-logical) methods used in this study, judicial conflicts and practice were analyzed, issues requiring legal solutions were identified, measures aimed at improving the current legislation were proposed. As a result, it will become obvious that the main issues on which such disputes arise are procedural in nature. The results of the study indicate the need to detail the legal norms on the jurisdiction of cases in the division of jointly acquired property of spouses, one of whom is bankrupt; jurisdiction of cases related to non-competitive contesting of transactions; jurisdiction of cases involving subsidiary liability when an organization is excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities administratively.
普通管辖权法院适用破产法的实际问题
这项研究似乎具有现实意义,因为对于与个人破产有关的某些类别的争议,目前还没有统一的做法。这篇科学文章的主要目的是确定所分析的纠纷类别的特点和审议现状,找出当前存在的问题,并为解决这些问题提出建议。实现这一目标的主要途径是研究现行立法、俄罗斯联邦最高法院的实践、一般管辖权法院以及仲裁法院的既定司法实践。在本研究使用的一般科学和私人科学(比较法、技术法律、形式逻辑)方法的基础上,对司法冲突和实践进行了分析,确定了需要法律解决的问题,并提出了旨在完善现行立法的措施。研究结果表明,产生此类争议的主要问题属于程序性问题。研究结果表明,有必要细化以下方面的法律规范:分割夫妻共同财产(其中一方已破产)案件的管辖权;与非竞争性交易争议有关的案件管辖权;当一个组织在行政上被排除在《国家法人实体统一登记册》之外时,涉及附属责任的案件管辖权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信