The Scale of Effective Decision-Making in Sport (SEDMS): Validity and Reliability Study

Mehmet Çağrı Çetin, Mehmet Kara
{"title":"The Scale of Effective Decision-Making in Sport (SEDMS): Validity and Reliability Study","authors":"Mehmet Çağrı Çetin, Mehmet Kara","doi":"10.53434/gbesbd.1377855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to develop a measurement tool that measures the level of influence in decision-making of licensed athletes aged 18 years and above who are active in sports. In the stages of creating the candidate form of the scale, writing essays by athletes, scale literature review, and interviews with focus groups were carried out within the scope of \"qualitative steps\", while hypothesis analyses and validity and reliability analyses were carried out within the scope of \"quantitative steps\". The expert opinion form prepared with 42 items in the item pool was presented to the experts for their evaluation according to the Lawshe technique. After the expert feedback, 15 items were removed, and 27 items remained. Trial scale form was administered online to 806 active licensed athletes aged 18 and over. Then, the basic assumptions of EFA were tested within the scope of quantitative steps; because of EFA, a 2 dimensional structure consisting of a total of 15 items was obtained. To examine the psychological construct validity of the SECVS, new data were obtained from 493 active licensed athletes by re-collecting data with the 15-item final form formed after EFA and CFA was performed. After CFA, the standardized loadings of the sub-dimensions, the estimated error variances of the variables, the T-values of all items and the goodness of fit values of the model were examined and it was determined that the 2 factor structure of the scale consisting of 15 items was confirmed as a model. In addition, when the convergent and divergent validity and convergent reliability values of the scale were examined after CFA, it was concluded that this scale had values in accordance with the criteria. Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as .87 for the ''External Decision Making'' sub-dimension and .85 for the ''Internal Decision Making'' sub-dimension. It was concluded that the SDEQ is a valid and reliable scale for measuring the decision-making effectiveness of athletes aged 18 and over.","PeriodicalId":472507,"journal":{"name":"Gazi beden eğitimi ve spor bilimleri dergisi","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazi beden eğitimi ve spor bilimleri dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53434/gbesbd.1377855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a measurement tool that measures the level of influence in decision-making of licensed athletes aged 18 years and above who are active in sports. In the stages of creating the candidate form of the scale, writing essays by athletes, scale literature review, and interviews with focus groups were carried out within the scope of "qualitative steps", while hypothesis analyses and validity and reliability analyses were carried out within the scope of "quantitative steps". The expert opinion form prepared with 42 items in the item pool was presented to the experts for their evaluation according to the Lawshe technique. After the expert feedback, 15 items were removed, and 27 items remained. Trial scale form was administered online to 806 active licensed athletes aged 18 and over. Then, the basic assumptions of EFA were tested within the scope of quantitative steps; because of EFA, a 2 dimensional structure consisting of a total of 15 items was obtained. To examine the psychological construct validity of the SECVS, new data were obtained from 493 active licensed athletes by re-collecting data with the 15-item final form formed after EFA and CFA was performed. After CFA, the standardized loadings of the sub-dimensions, the estimated error variances of the variables, the T-values of all items and the goodness of fit values of the model were examined and it was determined that the 2 factor structure of the scale consisting of 15 items was confirmed as a model. In addition, when the convergent and divergent validity and convergent reliability values of the scale were examined after CFA, it was concluded that this scale had values in accordance with the criteria. Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as .87 for the ''External Decision Making'' sub-dimension and .85 for the ''Internal Decision Making'' sub-dimension. It was concluded that the SDEQ is a valid and reliable scale for measuring the decision-making effectiveness of athletes aged 18 and over.
体育运动中有效决策量表(SEDMS):有效性和可靠性研究
本研究的目的是开发一种测量工具,用于测量 18 岁及以上积极参加体育运动的持证运 动员对决策的影响程度。在量表候选形式的创建阶段,在 "定性步骤 "范围内进行了运动员论文写作、量表文献综述和焦点小组访谈,在 "定量步骤 "范围内进行了假设分析和效度与信度分析。根据 Lawshe 技术,将项目库中的 42 个项目编制成专家意见表,提交给专家进行评估。专家反馈后,删除了 15 个项目,保留了 27 个项目。对 806 名 18 岁及以上的现役持证运动员进行了在线量表测试。然后,在定量步骤的范围内对 EFA 的基本假设进行了检验;通过 EFA,得到了由总共 15 个项目组成的 2 维结构。为了检验 SECVS 的心理建构效度,我们通过重新收集 493 名现役持证运动员的数据,以 EFA 和 CFA 后形成的 15 个项目的最终表单为基础,获得了新的数据。在进行 CFA 后,考察了各子维度的标准化载荷、变量的估计误差方差、所有项目的 T 值和模型的拟合优度值,确定了由 15 个项目组成的量表的 2 因子结构模型。此外,在进行 CFA 后,对量表的收敛效度、发散效度和收敛信度值进行了检验,结果表明该量表的值符合标准。经计算,"外部决策 "子维度的 Cronbach's alpha 内部一致性系数为 0.87,"内部决策 "子维度的 Cronbach's alpha 内部一致性系数为 0.85。结论是,SDEQ 是衡量 18 岁及以上运动员决策有效性的有效而可靠的量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信