{"title":"HEMŞİRELERE YÖNELİK PSİKOLOJİK ŞİDDET İLE ÇATIŞMA EYLEM STİLLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: KESİTSEL BİR ÇALIŞMA","authors":"Ceyda Mizrak, Nevin Günaydin","doi":"10.52369/togusagbilderg.1210118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aimed to evaluate correlation between psychological violence and conflict action styles against nurses and in order to identify factors affecting.. \nMaterials and Methods: This is a descriptive and correlational study. All registered nurses who communicate with patients and colleagues and work in a hospital setting were included in the study. The data of the study were collected using the \"Personal Data Collection Form\", \"Workplace Psychological Violence Instrument (WPVBI)\" and \"Conflict Activity Styles Inventory (CASI)\". Mann Whitney U test was determined by the Kruskal Wallis H test for independent groups. Dunn's multiple comparison test was used to determine the differences between groups. Extension of Generalized Linear Models (GDM) for assumptions of regression analysis were used. \nResults:The current study found that the CASI and WPVBI subscale scores of the nurses statistically differ in relation to the clinics they work in, the type of hospital they are in, their working hours, the number of patients they are caring for, the number of nurses working in shifts, the belief in teamwork, manager support, and the level of communication with the clinicians (p<0.05). Further analysis demonstrated that the total score effects of avoidant and compulsive approaches on WPVBI scores were statistically significant (p<0.05). \nConclusions: Nurses should be taught to use effective conflict action styles in order not to be exposed to psychological violence.","PeriodicalId":354480,"journal":{"name":"TOGÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi","volume":"206 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOGÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52369/togusagbilderg.1210118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate correlation between psychological violence and conflict action styles against nurses and in order to identify factors affecting..
Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive and correlational study. All registered nurses who communicate with patients and colleagues and work in a hospital setting were included in the study. The data of the study were collected using the "Personal Data Collection Form", "Workplace Psychological Violence Instrument (WPVBI)" and "Conflict Activity Styles Inventory (CASI)". Mann Whitney U test was determined by the Kruskal Wallis H test for independent groups. Dunn's multiple comparison test was used to determine the differences between groups. Extension of Generalized Linear Models (GDM) for assumptions of regression analysis were used.
Results:The current study found that the CASI and WPVBI subscale scores of the nurses statistically differ in relation to the clinics they work in, the type of hospital they are in, their working hours, the number of patients they are caring for, the number of nurses working in shifts, the belief in teamwork, manager support, and the level of communication with the clinicians (p<0.05). Further analysis demonstrated that the total score effects of avoidant and compulsive approaches on WPVBI scores were statistically significant (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Nurses should be taught to use effective conflict action styles in order not to be exposed to psychological violence.
目的:本研究旨在评估针对护士的心理暴力与冲突行动方式之间的相关性,并确定影响因素。材料与方法:这是一项描述性和相关性研究。研究对象包括所有在医院环境中工作并与患者和同事沟通的注册护士。研究数据通过 "个人数据收集表"、"工作场所心理暴力量表(WPVBI)"和 "冲突活动风格量表(CASI)"收集。曼-惠特尼 U 检验采用 Kruskal Wallis H 检验进行独立分组。邓恩多重比较检验用于确定组间差异。使用广义线性模型(GDM)扩展假设进行回归分析。结果:目前的研究发现,护士的 CASI 和 WPVBI 分量表得分与其工作的诊所、医院类型、工作时间、护理的病人数量、轮班工作的护士数量、团队合作信念、管理者支持以及与临床医生的沟通水平有关,存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。进一步分析表明,回避型和强迫型方法对 WPVBI 分数的总分影响具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:应教会护士使用有效的冲突行动方式,以避免遭受心理暴力。