Clinical relevance of nocebo effects in anesthesia practice: a narrative review

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
L. Cuyx, S. Rex
{"title":"Clinical relevance of nocebo effects in anesthesia practice: a narrative review","authors":"L. Cuyx, S. Rex","doi":"10.56126/75.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anesthesia practice has traditionally focused on technical skills and medical knowledge, but the importance of effective doctor-patient communication and patient-centered care is increasingly recognized. In this context, the nocebo effect is an important concept to be aware of as it can be associated with negative outcomes.\n\nObjective: This review summarizes the neurobiological and psychological factors underlying the formation of nocebo effects. Additionally, the implications of nocebo effects in clinical practice will be explored. Finally, we will provide a brief overview of communication concepts relevant to the physician-patient relationship that can help minimize nocebo effects and serve as a useful guide for anesthetists to improve their communication skills and provide better care to their patients.\n\nMethods: PubMed, Ovid and Cochrane library were searched using keywords related to “nocebo effect”, “anesthesia” and “communication”. In addition, we added articles found in references of identified articles relevant for our research.\n\nResults: Nocebo effects can arise from a variety of factors, including negative expectations, negative wording and suggestions, and a poor doctor-patient relationship. While nocebo effects can deteriorate health outcomes, appropriate verbal and non-verbal communication can improve patient satisfaction and subsequently health outcomes.\n\nConclusion: In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition of the importance of doctor-patient communication in anesthesia practice. Communication strategies such as active listening, empathy, and positive language should be incorporated into anesthesia training programs. More research is needed to fully understand the impact of the nocebo effect on health outcomes and to develop effective strategies to mitigate its negative effects.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/75.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anesthesia practice has traditionally focused on technical skills and medical knowledge, but the importance of effective doctor-patient communication and patient-centered care is increasingly recognized. In this context, the nocebo effect is an important concept to be aware of as it can be associated with negative outcomes. Objective: This review summarizes the neurobiological and psychological factors underlying the formation of nocebo effects. Additionally, the implications of nocebo effects in clinical practice will be explored. Finally, we will provide a brief overview of communication concepts relevant to the physician-patient relationship that can help minimize nocebo effects and serve as a useful guide for anesthetists to improve their communication skills and provide better care to their patients. Methods: PubMed, Ovid and Cochrane library were searched using keywords related to “nocebo effect”, “anesthesia” and “communication”. In addition, we added articles found in references of identified articles relevant for our research. Results: Nocebo effects can arise from a variety of factors, including negative expectations, negative wording and suggestions, and a poor doctor-patient relationship. While nocebo effects can deteriorate health outcomes, appropriate verbal and non-verbal communication can improve patient satisfaction and subsequently health outcomes. Conclusion: In recent years, there has been an increasing recognition of the importance of doctor-patient communication in anesthesia practice. Communication strategies such as active listening, empathy, and positive language should be incorporated into anesthesia training programs. More research is needed to fully understand the impact of the nocebo effect on health outcomes and to develop effective strategies to mitigate its negative effects.
麻醉实践中知觉效应的临床意义:叙述性综述
背景:麻醉实践历来侧重于技术技能和医学知识,但有效的医患沟通和以患者为中心的护理的重要性日益得到认可。在这种情况下,我们需要注意 "前兆效应 "这一重要概念,因为它可能与负面结果有关:这篇综述总结了形成预兆效应的神经生物学和心理学因素。此外,我们还将探讨前兆效应对临床实践的影响。最后,我们将简要概述与医患关系相关的沟通概念,这些概念有助于最大限度地减少前功尽弃效应,并为麻醉师提高沟通技巧和为患者提供更好的护理提供有用的指导:使用与 "虚惊效应"、"麻醉 "和 "沟通 "相关的关键词对 PubMed、Ovid 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了检索。此外,我们还添加了在已确定文章的参考文献中发现的与我们的研究相关的文章:前兆效应可由多种因素引起,包括负面期望、负面措辞和建议以及不良的医患关系。虽然前兆效应会恶化健康结果,但适当的语言和非语言沟通可以提高患者的满意度,进而改善健康结果:近年来,人们越来越认识到麻醉实践中医患沟通的重要性。积极倾听、换位思考和积极语言等沟通策略应纳入麻醉培训计划。要充分了解 "前兆效应 "对健康结果的影响,并制定有效的策略来减轻其负面影响,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信