Integrate between information systems engineering and software engineering theories for successful quality engineering measurement of software: Valid instrument pre-results

Amani Ali Ibrahim Almetwaly, I. Fadhel
{"title":"Integrate between information systems engineering and software engineering theories for successful quality engineering measurement of software: Valid instrument pre-results","authors":"Amani Ali Ibrahim Almetwaly, I. Fadhel","doi":"10.24294/csma.v6i1.3382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An extensive number of instruments and systems assessment tools are weak and not good enough in the appraisal of systems’ quality engineer success measurement. Thus, the comprehension of systems’ success is very serious. One of the purposes of this research topic is to develop a successful, novel, validated instrument for measuring system quality success based on the integration between theories of information systems (Seddon and DeLone & McLean) and software engineering theory (ISO 25010). To ensure the quality of the instrument before use, eight academic experts have validated. The reason for expanding the number of experts to eight is to accurately build and evaluate the instrument because this instrument is the first one erring. After expert validation done successfully, researchers started the process of instrument pre-test. Pre-test verification and validation results done by test the instrument of 74 users. The results of the statistical testing were perfect. The Composite reliability proposed value is 0.7, The average variance extracted value is 0.5. Cronbach’s alpha is higher than 0.7. The value of Spearman’s reliable rhea is >0.6. Results approved that this instrument is strong and perfect to be used as a valid tool for system success measurement.","PeriodicalId":505445,"journal":{"name":"Computer Software and Media Applications","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Software and Media Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24294/csma.v6i1.3382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An extensive number of instruments and systems assessment tools are weak and not good enough in the appraisal of systems’ quality engineer success measurement. Thus, the comprehension of systems’ success is very serious. One of the purposes of this research topic is to develop a successful, novel, validated instrument for measuring system quality success based on the integration between theories of information systems (Seddon and DeLone & McLean) and software engineering theory (ISO 25010). To ensure the quality of the instrument before use, eight academic experts have validated. The reason for expanding the number of experts to eight is to accurately build and evaluate the instrument because this instrument is the first one erring. After expert validation done successfully, researchers started the process of instrument pre-test. Pre-test verification and validation results done by test the instrument of 74 users. The results of the statistical testing were perfect. The Composite reliability proposed value is 0.7, The average variance extracted value is 0.5. Cronbach’s alpha is higher than 0.7. The value of Spearman’s reliable rhea is >0.6. Results approved that this instrument is strong and perfect to be used as a valid tool for system success measurement.
整合信息系统工程和软件工程理论,成功进行软件质量工程测量:有效仪器的预结果
大量的工具和系统评估工具在评估系统质量工程师的成功衡量方面都很薄弱,不够完善。因此,对系统成功的理解非常重要。本研究课题的目的之一是在信息系统理论(Seddon 和 DeLone & McLean)和软件工程理论(ISO 25010)的基础上,开发一种成功的、新颖的、经过验证的系统质量成功度测量工具。为确保该工具在使用前的质量,八位学术专家对其进行了验证。将专家人数增加到八位的原因是为了准确地构建和评估该工具,因为该工具是第一个出错的工具。专家论证成功后,研究人员开始了工具的预试过程。通过对 74 名用户进行测试,对测试结果进行了验证和确认。统计测试的结果非常完美。综合信度建议值为 0.7,平均方差提取值为 0.5。Cronbach's alpha 高于 0.7。斯皮尔曼信度值大于 0.6。结果表明,该工具非常强大,完全可以作为系统成功度测量的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信