Extensometry Study of the Most Appropriate Position and Arrangement of Stress-Breaker Bridges with Pier Abutment

Carolina Barletta del Campo, J. Gracia Rodríguez, G. Fidalgo Valverde, F. S. Sánchez Lasheras
{"title":"Extensometry Study of the Most Appropriate Position and Arrangement of Stress-Breaker Bridges with Pier Abutment","authors":"Carolina Barletta del Campo, J. Gracia Rodríguez, G. Fidalgo Valverde, F. S. Sánchez Lasheras","doi":"10.3390/prosthesis6020017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arrangement of a stress breaker in the pier abutment of a fixed-mobile bridge affects the deformations that may occur in its supports. This article aims to study the most appropriate position and arrangement of a stress breaker. To verify the established objectives, an experimental “in vitro” study was carried out with five different bridge designs: one with rigid connectors and four with non-rigid connectors (interlocks), placed on the distal and mesial surface of the intermediate abutment, and combining the retention stop at cervical and occlusal positions. The strain level at the support ground of each bridge was measured with strain gauges. The statistical analysis was performed with the help of the Kruskal–Wallis test and a linear regression model. Initial results show that the model with the highest average value of maximum strain is the non-rigid bridge with the interlock on the distal surface of the pier abutment and the occlusal retention stop. In any case, the presence of an intermediate abutment, with or without interlock, influences the maximum tension supported by the abutment, especially in relation to the intermediate abutment.","PeriodicalId":506748,"journal":{"name":"Prosthesis","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6020017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The arrangement of a stress breaker in the pier abutment of a fixed-mobile bridge affects the deformations that may occur in its supports. This article aims to study the most appropriate position and arrangement of a stress breaker. To verify the established objectives, an experimental “in vitro” study was carried out with five different bridge designs: one with rigid connectors and four with non-rigid connectors (interlocks), placed on the distal and mesial surface of the intermediate abutment, and combining the retention stop at cervical and occlusal positions. The strain level at the support ground of each bridge was measured with strain gauges. The statistical analysis was performed with the help of the Kruskal–Wallis test and a linear regression model. Initial results show that the model with the highest average value of maximum strain is the non-rigid bridge with the interlock on the distal surface of the pier abutment and the occlusal retention stop. In any case, the presence of an intermediate abutment, with or without interlock, influences the maximum tension supported by the abutment, especially in relation to the intermediate abutment.
墩式桥台应力消除桥最合适位置和布置的伸长测量研究
应力破碎锤在固定-移动桥梁墩台上的布置会影响其支座可能发生的变形。本文旨在研究应力破碎锤的最合适位置和布置。为了验证既定目标,我们使用五种不同的桥体设计进行了 "体外 "实验研究:一种是刚性连接体,四种是非刚性连接体(互锁),分别放置在中间基台的远端和中端表面,并将颈部和咬合位置的固位挡块结合在一起。使用应变片测量了每个桥体支撑面的应变水平。借助 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和线性回归模型进行了统计分析。初步结果表明,最大应变平均值最高的模型是桥墩基台远端表面与咬合固位挡块互锁的非刚性桥。无论如何,中间基台的存在(有无联锁)都会影响基台支持的最大张力,尤其是与中间基台的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信