Monitoring of Thiamethoxam Resistance in Turkish House Fly Strains, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PARASITOLOGY
Huseyin Cetin, A. Yanıkoğlu, Esin Akarsu, Mehmet Civril, Eylül Odabaş, Samed Koc, Emre Oz, Burak Polat
{"title":"Monitoring of Thiamethoxam Resistance in Turkish House Fly Strains, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)","authors":"Huseyin Cetin, A. Yanıkoğlu, Esin Akarsu, Mehmet Civril, Eylül Odabaş, Samed Koc, Emre Oz, Burak Polat","doi":"10.18502/jad.v17i3.14982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The house fly, Musca domestica, is vector for pathogens and parasites and causes economic damage to livestock by reducing forage conversion efficiency, negatively impacting weight gain and milk production. It has shown resistance to multiple insecticide classes. The aim of this research was to determine the susceptibility levels of seven­teen field M. domestica strains to thiamethoxam, a neonicotinoid insecticide, in Türkiye. \nMethods: Insecticide susceptibility of the house flies to thiamethoxam was determined using the WHO glass jar meth­od. A probit analysis program was used to determine LD50 values, and then the resistance ratios were compared with insecticide-susceptible strain. \nResults: All strains were ≥18.5-fold resistant to thiamethoxam. The data showed that 10 out of 17 strains had either high or very high resistance levels. Our findings revealed that house flies from solid waste landfills in Samsun, Ankara, and Kocaeli exhibited higher resistance ratios compared to those found in animal shelters. Conversely, in Gaziantep, Antalya, İzmir and Erzurum, the exact opposite trend was observed. Regarding the LD50 values among solid waste stor­age areas, the lowest rate was obtained from Gaziantep (0.72 gr ai/m2), and the highest rate was obtained from Ankara (9.35 gr ai/m2). Furthermore, regarding the LD50 values among animal shelters, the lowest was obtained from Samsun (0.37 gr ai/m2), and the highest was obtained from Denizli (21800 gr ai/m2). \nConclusion: The use of integrated control systems is recommended for controlling house fly populations, including insecticide class rotations for preventing, or at least, delaying the onset of resistance. \n ","PeriodicalId":15095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v17i3.14982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The house fly, Musca domestica, is vector for pathogens and parasites and causes economic damage to livestock by reducing forage conversion efficiency, negatively impacting weight gain and milk production. It has shown resistance to multiple insecticide classes. The aim of this research was to determine the susceptibility levels of seven­teen field M. domestica strains to thiamethoxam, a neonicotinoid insecticide, in Türkiye. Methods: Insecticide susceptibility of the house flies to thiamethoxam was determined using the WHO glass jar meth­od. A probit analysis program was used to determine LD50 values, and then the resistance ratios were compared with insecticide-susceptible strain. Results: All strains were ≥18.5-fold resistant to thiamethoxam. The data showed that 10 out of 17 strains had either high or very high resistance levels. Our findings revealed that house flies from solid waste landfills in Samsun, Ankara, and Kocaeli exhibited higher resistance ratios compared to those found in animal shelters. Conversely, in Gaziantep, Antalya, İzmir and Erzurum, the exact opposite trend was observed. Regarding the LD50 values among solid waste stor­age areas, the lowest rate was obtained from Gaziantep (0.72 gr ai/m2), and the highest rate was obtained from Ankara (9.35 gr ai/m2). Furthermore, regarding the LD50 values among animal shelters, the lowest was obtained from Samsun (0.37 gr ai/m2), and the highest was obtained from Denizli (21800 gr ai/m2). Conclusion: The use of integrated control systems is recommended for controlling house fly populations, including insecticide class rotations for preventing, or at least, delaying the onset of resistance.  
监测土耳其家蝇(Musca domestica,双翅目:麝科)品系的噻虫嗪抗药性
背景:家蝇(Musca domestica)是病原体和寄生虫的传播媒介,会降低饲料转化效率,对增重和产奶量产生负面影响,从而给牲畜造成经济损失。家蝇对多种杀虫剂具有抗药性。本研究旨在确定土尔其 17 个田间家蝇菌株对新烟碱类杀虫剂噻虫嗪的敏感性水平。研究方法采用世界卫生组织的玻璃瓶法测定家蝇对噻虫嗪杀虫剂的敏感性。使用 probit 分析程序确定半数致死剂量值,然后将抗药性比率与杀虫剂敏感株进行比较。结果所有菌株对噻虫嗪的抗性≥18.5倍。数据显示,17 个菌株中有 10 个对噻虫嗪具有较高或很高的抗药性。我们的研究结果表明,萨姆松、安卡拉和科贾埃利的固体废物填埋场中的家蝇与动物收容所中的家蝇相比,表现出更高的抗药性比率。相反,在加济安泰普、安塔利亚、伊兹密尔和埃尔祖鲁姆却观察到了完全相反的趋势。关于固体废物储存区的半数致死剂量,加济安泰普的比率最低(0.72 gr ai/m2),安卡拉的比率最高(9.35 gr ai/m2)。此外,关于动物收容所的半数致死剂量,萨姆松(0.37 gr ai/m2)最低,代尼兹利(21800 gr ai/m2)最高。结论:建议使用综合控制系统:建议使用综合控制系统控制家蝇种群,包括轮换杀虫剂种类,以防止或至少延缓抗药性的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-PARASITOLOGY
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research paper, short communica­tion, scientific note, case report, letter to the editor, and review article in English. The scope of papers comprises all aspects of arthropod borne diseases includ­ing: ● Systematics ● Vector ecology ● Epidemiology ● Immunology ● Parasitology ● Molecular biology ● Genetics ● Population dynamics ● Toxicology ● Vector control ● Diagnosis and treatment and other related subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信