Productivity of spring wheat varieties against the background of different methods of basic tillage in arid conditions

A. Panfilov, Rinat R. Abdrashitov
{"title":"Productivity of spring wheat varieties against the background of different methods of basic tillage in arid conditions","authors":"A. Panfilov, Rinat R. Abdrashitov","doi":"10.32417/1997-4868-2024-24-02-172-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The article provides data on the reserves of productive moisture, the content of nitrate nitrogen, and the yield of spring wheat varieties when grown under different backgrounds of basic tillage. The purpose of the research is to study the response of spring soft and durum wheat varieties to the methods of basic tillage. Methods. The object of research is 3 varieties of spring soft wheat and 2 varieties of spring durum wheat. The experiments were carried out in the central zone of the Orenburg region. For 5 years, two options for basic soil cultivation were studied: plowing to a depth of 23–25 cm and moldless loosening to a depth of 25–27 cm. Scientific novelty. The reaction of spring wheat varieties to the methods of basic tillage, taking into account the reserves of productive moisture and the content of nitrate nitrogen in the soil, in the arid conditions of the Orenburg Cis-Urals was revealed. Results. The reserves of productive moisture during the sprouting phase of spring wheat in a meter layer of soil were satisfactory (less than 130 mm) for four years out of five years of research, and good for one year (150-153 mm). The advantage of non-moldboard tillage was noted in all years of research with the exception of 2019, when the mouldboard background contained 18 mm more soil moisture. Depending on weather conditions, the amount of nitrate nitrogen in the soil varied from very low values in 2022 to high and very high values in 2017 and 2019–2020. The yield of spring wheat, on average according to experience, was 0.6 c per 1 ha higher against the background of moldless loosening. The varietal response to basic soil tillage methods has been established. The Uchitel’ variety did not respond to processing techniques. For other varieties, the difference in favor of non-moldboard tillage ranged from 0.4 centners per 1 hectare for the Tulaykovskaya zolotistaya variety, to 0.7–0.8 centners per 1 hectare for the varieties Ul’yanovskaya 105, Orenburgskaya 10, Bezenchukskaya 210.","PeriodicalId":125083,"journal":{"name":"Agrarian Bulletin of the","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrarian Bulletin of the","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2024-24-02-172-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The article provides data on the reserves of productive moisture, the content of nitrate nitrogen, and the yield of spring wheat varieties when grown under different backgrounds of basic tillage. The purpose of the research is to study the response of spring soft and durum wheat varieties to the methods of basic tillage. Methods. The object of research is 3 varieties of spring soft wheat and 2 varieties of spring durum wheat. The experiments were carried out in the central zone of the Orenburg region. For 5 years, two options for basic soil cultivation were studied: plowing to a depth of 23–25 cm and moldless loosening to a depth of 25–27 cm. Scientific novelty. The reaction of spring wheat varieties to the methods of basic tillage, taking into account the reserves of productive moisture and the content of nitrate nitrogen in the soil, in the arid conditions of the Orenburg Cis-Urals was revealed. Results. The reserves of productive moisture during the sprouting phase of spring wheat in a meter layer of soil were satisfactory (less than 130 mm) for four years out of five years of research, and good for one year (150-153 mm). The advantage of non-moldboard tillage was noted in all years of research with the exception of 2019, when the mouldboard background contained 18 mm more soil moisture. Depending on weather conditions, the amount of nitrate nitrogen in the soil varied from very low values in 2022 to high and very high values in 2017 and 2019–2020. The yield of spring wheat, on average according to experience, was 0.6 c per 1 ha higher against the background of moldless loosening. The varietal response to basic soil tillage methods has been established. The Uchitel’ variety did not respond to processing techniques. For other varieties, the difference in favor of non-moldboard tillage ranged from 0.4 centners per 1 hectare for the Tulaykovskaya zolotistaya variety, to 0.7–0.8 centners per 1 hectare for the varieties Ul’yanovskaya 105, Orenburgskaya 10, Bezenchukskaya 210.
干旱条件下不同基本耕作方法背景下春小麦品种的生产力
摘要文章提供了春小麦品种在不同基础耕作背景下的生产水分储备、硝态氮含量和产量数据。研究的目的是研究春软小麦和硬质小麦品种对基础耕作方法的反应。研究方法。研究对象是 3 个春季软质小麦品种和 2 个春季硬质小麦品种。试验在奥伦堡州中部地区进行。在 5 年时间里研究了两种基本土壤耕作方案:耕作深度为 23-25 厘米和无模松土深度为 25-27 厘米。科学新颖性。考虑到奥伦堡奇斯-乌拉尔地区干旱条件下土壤中的生产水分储备和硝态氮含量,揭示了春小麦品种对基本耕作方法的反应。研究结果在五年的研究中,春小麦萌芽期在一米土层中的生产水分储量有四年是令人满意的(小于 130 毫米),有一年是良好的(150-153 毫米)。除 2019 年外,所有研究年份都显示出非模板耕作的优势,当时模板背景的土壤水分多出 18 毫米。根据天气条件,土壤中的硝态氮含量从 2022 年的极低值到 2017 年和 2019-2020 年的高值和极高值不等。根据经验,在无模松土的背景下,春小麦的产量平均每 1 公顷高出 0.6 c。品种对基本土壤耕作方法的反应已经确定。Uchitel'品种对加工技术没有反应。对其他品种来说,有利于无模松土的差异从 "Tulaykovskaya zolotistaya "品种的每公顷 0.4 厘米到 "Ul'yanovskaya 105"、"Orenburgskaya 10"、"Bezenchukskaya 210 "品种的每公顷 0.7-0.8 厘米不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信