Workflow Optimization of Material Management Process by Digital Adoption in Indian Residential Projects

Sadhayadharshni C, Mr. M. Kranti Kumar
{"title":"Workflow Optimization of Material Management Process by Digital Adoption in Indian Residential Projects","authors":"Sadhayadharshni C, Mr. M. Kranti Kumar","doi":"10.35940/ijmh.f1687.10060224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To analyze the present day’s material management process and the extent of digital adoption in the workflow; to identify the shortcomings in the present day’s practice; and to formulate digital inclusive framework to manage materials. Objectives 1 & 2 is achieved through 3 step process – Literature review to identify the related shortcomings (factors) and online/ web search to explore available technology; Survey(s) to assess the real time status on the factors, to identify more practical difficulties and the extent of digital adoption in the workflow; Interviewing seasoned professions to gather data in detail with respect to material. Objective 3 is achieved by comparison and analysis of the findings. Validation of the framework to assess the potential effects – Partial validation is performed as part of this study. Workflow involved in construction material management is optimized via framework. Autodesk Revit, MS Project, and MS Access are the 3 platforms proposed to be part of the framework that suits every phase of the process like Quantity survey and Estimation, Procurement Planning, Inventory, Purchasing and Store Management. Partial framework - MS Project has been validated and the results are – Ability to map the data efficiently; Précised Budget & material requirement identification resulted in an increase of 1% cost in the overall project budget; Easy Cross verification; Easy documentation; Data driven decision making; Multi - dimensional data visibility. The studies in the past have stressed on the benefits of digitalization and the willingness of construction sector in adopting the same. 2019, 2020 and 2021 studies have explored individual digital platform such as MSP, Primavera, and Revit in terms of part functions involved in material management. Whereas there is no study stating the order of workflow between these platforms for complete material management. Also, the studies in the past failed to identify and address the shortcomings related to the digital adoption. Hence, this study proposed a framework that determines the order of the workflow involved in material management between these digital platforms with an aim to optimizing the workflow.","PeriodicalId":14104,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.f1687.10060224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To analyze the present day’s material management process and the extent of digital adoption in the workflow; to identify the shortcomings in the present day’s practice; and to formulate digital inclusive framework to manage materials. Objectives 1 & 2 is achieved through 3 step process – Literature review to identify the related shortcomings (factors) and online/ web search to explore available technology; Survey(s) to assess the real time status on the factors, to identify more practical difficulties and the extent of digital adoption in the workflow; Interviewing seasoned professions to gather data in detail with respect to material. Objective 3 is achieved by comparison and analysis of the findings. Validation of the framework to assess the potential effects – Partial validation is performed as part of this study. Workflow involved in construction material management is optimized via framework. Autodesk Revit, MS Project, and MS Access are the 3 platforms proposed to be part of the framework that suits every phase of the process like Quantity survey and Estimation, Procurement Planning, Inventory, Purchasing and Store Management. Partial framework - MS Project has been validated and the results are – Ability to map the data efficiently; Précised Budget & material requirement identification resulted in an increase of 1% cost in the overall project budget; Easy Cross verification; Easy documentation; Data driven decision making; Multi - dimensional data visibility. The studies in the past have stressed on the benefits of digitalization and the willingness of construction sector in adopting the same. 2019, 2020 and 2021 studies have explored individual digital platform such as MSP, Primavera, and Revit in terms of part functions involved in material management. Whereas there is no study stating the order of workflow between these platforms for complete material management. Also, the studies in the past failed to identify and address the shortcomings related to the digital adoption. Hence, this study proposed a framework that determines the order of the workflow involved in material management between these digital platforms with an aim to optimizing the workflow.
印度住宅项目采用数字化技术优化材料管理流程
分析当今的物资管理流程和工作流程中的数字化应用程度;找出当今实践中的不足之处;制定物资管理的数字化包容性框架。目标 1 和 2 通过三个步骤实现--通过文献综述找出相关不足(因素),通过在线/网络搜索探索可用技术;通过调查评估各因素的实时状况,找出更多实际困难,以及在工作流程中采用数字化的程度;采访经验丰富的专业人员,收集有关材料的详细数据。目标 3 通过比较和分析研究结果来实现。验证框架以评估潜在影响--部分验证是本研究的一部分。通过框架优化建筑材料管理所涉及的工作流程。Autodesk Revit、MS Project 和 MS Access 是建议作为框架一部分的 3 个平台,适用于流程的每个阶段,如工程量调查和估算、采购计划、库存、采购和商店管理。部分框架--MS Project 已经过验证,其结果是--能够有效地映射数据;精确的预算和材料需求识别使整个项目预算增加了 1%的成本;易于交叉验证;易于文档编制;数据驱动决策;多维数据可见性。过去的研究强调了数字化的好处以及建筑行业采用数字化的意愿。2019 年、2020 年和 2021 年的研究探讨了 MSP、Primavera 和 Revit 等单个数字化平台在材料管理中的部分功能。而没有研究说明这些平台之间的工作流程顺序,以实现完整的材料管理。此外,过去的研究也未能发现和解决与数字化应用相关的不足之处。因此,本研究提出了一个框架,以确定这些数字平台之间涉及材料管理的工作流程顺序,从而优化工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信