Comparison of Upstream and Downstream Configuration Drivers in Automotive Industry Supply Networks: An Exploratory Study Using ERGMs

Chulsoon Park
{"title":"Comparison of Upstream and Downstream Configuration Drivers in Automotive Industry Supply Networks: An Exploratory Study Using ERGMs","authors":"Chulsoon Park","doi":"10.32956/kopoms.2024.35.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern industry is a competition between supply networks. Knowing and managing the supply network well is an essential survival requirement for a company. There is a difference in orientation between the upstream and downstream of the supply network, which causes structural differences between the upstream and downstream. This study aims to reveal the differences in the configuration drivers of the upstream and downstream automotive supply networks. Using transaction data from the automotive industry, we compared the drivers that constitute supply networks and create upstream and downstream links. The Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) were used to evaluate the significance of configuration drivers, including company attributes, dyadic attributes, and structural characteristics. As a result, the age of supplier, size of the purchaser, sales of the purchaser, asset of the purchaser, transitivity, and activity were found to be common drivers of upstream and downstream. On the other hand, the age of the purchaser, the difference in sales between the two companies, and popularity were found to be significant drivers only in the downstream network. These research results are the first to empirically compare the upstream and downstream supply networks, and have academic contribution as the first step in finding the cause of the differences in network structure between the upstream and downstream networks.","PeriodicalId":436415,"journal":{"name":"Korean Production and Operations Management Society","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Production and Operations Management Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32956/kopoms.2024.35.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern industry is a competition between supply networks. Knowing and managing the supply network well is an essential survival requirement for a company. There is a difference in orientation between the upstream and downstream of the supply network, which causes structural differences between the upstream and downstream. This study aims to reveal the differences in the configuration drivers of the upstream and downstream automotive supply networks. Using transaction data from the automotive industry, we compared the drivers that constitute supply networks and create upstream and downstream links. The Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) were used to evaluate the significance of configuration drivers, including company attributes, dyadic attributes, and structural characteristics. As a result, the age of supplier, size of the purchaser, sales of the purchaser, asset of the purchaser, transitivity, and activity were found to be common drivers of upstream and downstream. On the other hand, the age of the purchaser, the difference in sales between the two companies, and popularity were found to be significant drivers only in the downstream network. These research results are the first to empirically compare the upstream and downstream supply networks, and have academic contribution as the first step in finding the cause of the differences in network structure between the upstream and downstream networks.
汽车行业供应网络中上游和下游配置驱动因素的比较:使用 ERGMs 的探索性研究
现代工业是供应网络之间的竞争。了解并管理好供应网络是企业生存的基本要求。供应网络的上下游之间存在定位差异,从而导致上下游之间的结构差异。本研究旨在揭示汽车供应网络上下游配置驱动因素的差异。我们利用汽车行业的交易数据,比较了构成供应网络和建立上下游联系的驱动因素。我们使用指数随机图模型(ERGM)来评估配置驱动因素的重要性,包括公司属性、干系属性和结构特征。结果发现,供应商的年龄、采购商的规模、采购商的销售额、采购商的资产、过渡性和活动是上下游的共同驱动因素。另一方面,采购商的年龄、两家公司之间的销售额差异和知名度仅在下游网络中是重要的驱动因素。这些研究成果首次对上下游供应网络进行了实证比较,为寻找上下游网络结构差异的原因迈出了第一步,具有学术贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信