Comparison of infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

Laxman K Senapati
{"title":"Comparison of infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine on\n maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in caesarean section under spinal\n anaesthesia","authors":"Laxman K Senapati","doi":"10.55522/jmpas.v13i1.5919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthetic technique for the\n caesarean section, on the downside it is often associated with complications like\n maternal hypotension. We compared phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine\n infusions to maintain blood pressure during the caesarian section under subarachnoid\n block. Our study included 240 parturients with singleton-term pregnancies undergoing a\n caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Following spinal anesthesia till the delivery\n of the baby, parturients randomly assigned to three groups received phenylephrine,\n norepinephrine, and mephentermine infusions.Heart rate, blood pressure, intra-operative\n nausea and vomiting, neonatal Apgar score, and total rescue vasopressors required were\n analyzed. Except at 4 min (p=0.006), ANOVA revealed no statistically significant\n difference in systolic blood pressure between the groups across all time points.\n Systolic blood pressure showed a significant difference between the mephentermine group\n versus the phenylephrine group (p=0.013) and the norepinephrine group versus the\n phenylephrine group (p=0.022) at four minutes post hoc Bonferroni. Except at 15 and 60\n minutes (p=0.02 and p=0.001, Refer This Article Amit Pradhan, Rasulata Swain,\n Priyadarsini Samanta, Laxman K Senapati, Ganesh C Satapathy, 2024. Comparison of\n infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and Mephentermine on maternal hemodynamics\n and neonatal outcomes in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. . Journal of\n medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences, V 13 - I 1, Pages- 6392 – 6400. Doi:\n https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.V13I1.5919.respectively), the mean heart rate was\n comparable among the three groups. The Chi-square test revealed no statistically\n significant difference in the requirement of rescue drugs among the groups (ϰ2=1.57,\n p=0.45) except at the time point of 4 minutes (p=0.01) when the highest requirement was\n observed in the phenylephrine group. The Apgar scores amongst the groups were comparable\n at 1 min (p=0.99) and 5 min (p=0.98). In the lower segment caesarian section under the\n subarachnoid block, infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine were\n equally effective in managing maternal hypotension and achieving favorable neonatal\n outcomes.","PeriodicalId":16445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.v13i1.5919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthetic technique for the caesarean section, on the downside it is often associated with complications like maternal hypotension. We compared phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine infusions to maintain blood pressure during the caesarian section under subarachnoid block. Our study included 240 parturients with singleton-term pregnancies undergoing a caesarian section under spinal anesthesia. Following spinal anesthesia till the delivery of the baby, parturients randomly assigned to three groups received phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine infusions.Heart rate, blood pressure, intra-operative nausea and vomiting, neonatal Apgar score, and total rescue vasopressors required were analyzed. Except at 4 min (p=0.006), ANOVA revealed no statistically significant difference in systolic blood pressure between the groups across all time points. Systolic blood pressure showed a significant difference between the mephentermine group versus the phenylephrine group (p=0.013) and the norepinephrine group versus the phenylephrine group (p=0.022) at four minutes post hoc Bonferroni. Except at 15 and 60 minutes (p=0.02 and p=0.001, Refer This Article Amit Pradhan, Rasulata Swain, Priyadarsini Samanta, Laxman K Senapati, Ganesh C Satapathy, 2024. Comparison of infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and Mephentermine on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. . Journal of medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences, V 13 - I 1, Pages- 6392 – 6400. Doi: https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.V13I1.5919.respectively), the mean heart rate was comparable among the three groups. The Chi-square test revealed no statistically significant difference in the requirement of rescue drugs among the groups (ϰ2=1.57, p=0.45) except at the time point of 4 minutes (p=0.01) when the highest requirement was observed in the phenylephrine group. The Apgar scores amongst the groups were comparable at 1 min (p=0.99) and 5 min (p=0.98). In the lower segment caesarian section under the subarachnoid block, infusions of phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and mephentermine were equally effective in managing maternal hypotension and achieving favorable neonatal outcomes.
脊髓麻醉下剖腹产术中输注苯肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素和美芬丁胺对产妇血流动力学和新生儿预后的影响比较
虽然蛛网膜下腔阻滞是剖腹产的首选麻醉技术,但其缺点是经常会引起产妇低血压等并发症。我们比较了在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下进行剖腹产时输注苯肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素和美芬丁胺以维持血压的情况。我们的研究包括 240 名在脊髓麻醉下进行剖腹产手术的单胎足月孕妇。研究分析了心率、血压、术中恶心和呕吐、新生儿Apgar评分以及所需的抢救性血管加压剂总量。方差分析显示,除 4 分钟(P=0.006)外,各组间收缩压在所有时间点的差异均无统计学意义。在 4 分钟时,收缩压在美芬特明组与苯肾上腺素组(P=0.013)和去甲肾上腺素组与苯肾上腺素组(P=0.022)之间存在显著差异,并进行了 Bonferroni 检验。除了在 15 分钟和 60 分钟时(P=0.02 和 P=0.001,参考本文 Amit Pradhan、Rasulata Swain、Priyadarsini Samanta、Laxman K Senapati、Ganesh C Satapathy,2024 年),苯肾上腺素组与去甲肾上腺素组相比(P=0.013),去甲肾上腺素组与苯肾上腺素组相比(P=0.022)。在脊髓麻醉下剖腹产时输注苯肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素和美芬丁胺对产妇血流动力学和新生儿预后的影响比较。.Journal of medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences, V 13 - I 1, Pages- 6392 - 6400.Doi:https://doi.org/10.55522/jmpas.V13I1.5919.respectively),三组的平均心率相当。卡方检验显示,除了在 4 分钟(p=0.01)时,苯肾上腺素组对抢救药物的需求量最高外,其他各组对抢救药物的需求量在统计学上无显著差异(ϰ2=1.57,p=0.45)。各组在 1 分钟(p=0.99)和 5 分钟(p=0.98)时的 Apgar 评分相当。在蛛网膜下腔阻滞的下段剖腹产中,输注苯肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素和美芬丁胺对控制产妇低血压和获得良好的新生儿预后同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信