Understanding institutional layers and modes of change for energy transitions: Analysis of Norway's electricity sector reforms

Minika Ekanem, B. Noble, G. Poelzer, Hans‐Kristian Hernes
{"title":"Understanding institutional layers and modes of change for energy transitions: Analysis of Norway's electricity sector reforms","authors":"Minika Ekanem, B. Noble, G. Poelzer, Hans‐Kristian Hernes","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutions have significant implications for whether and how energy systems restructure, evolve, and successfully transition. Yet, literature analyzing energy sector reforms often approach transitions from economic or technical perspectives, with much less attention to the underlying roles and influences of institutions. This paper explores the roles and influence of institutions on the speed, direction, timing, and sequence of energy transitions. A conceptual framework integrating the hierarchy of institutions with an historical institutionalist approach is developed and applied to explore transitions in Norway's electricity sector as a case study. Results show that conversion followed by layering emerge as the dominant modes of institutional change in Norway's electricity sector reform, illustrating the importance of alignment between institutions in creating the conditions for large‐scale energy transitions and the importance of boundaries to maintain alignment between levels of institutions. Governments can minimize potential gaps between transition intentions and outcomes through effective conversion and layering of institutional arrangements, but layering challenges emerge when institutional change introduces new actors or energy arenas to existing policy paradigms.","PeriodicalId":509462,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Political Studies","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Institutions have significant implications for whether and how energy systems restructure, evolve, and successfully transition. Yet, literature analyzing energy sector reforms often approach transitions from economic or technical perspectives, with much less attention to the underlying roles and influences of institutions. This paper explores the roles and influence of institutions on the speed, direction, timing, and sequence of energy transitions. A conceptual framework integrating the hierarchy of institutions with an historical institutionalist approach is developed and applied to explore transitions in Norway's electricity sector as a case study. Results show that conversion followed by layering emerge as the dominant modes of institutional change in Norway's electricity sector reform, illustrating the importance of alignment between institutions in creating the conditions for large‐scale energy transitions and the importance of boundaries to maintain alignment between levels of institutions. Governments can minimize potential gaps between transition intentions and outcomes through effective conversion and layering of institutional arrangements, but layering challenges emerge when institutional change introduces new actors or energy arenas to existing policy paradigms.
了解能源转型的制度层次和变革模式:挪威电力部门改革分析
制度对能源系统是否以及如何重组、演变和成功转型具有重要影响。然而,分析能源行业改革的文献往往从经济或技术角度来探讨转型问题,而较少关注制度的潜在作用和影响。本文探讨了制度对能源转型的速度、方向、时机和顺序的作用和影响。本文建立了一个概念框架,将制度层次与历史制度主义方法相结合,并将其应用于挪威电力行业的转型案例研究。结果表明,在挪威电力部门改革中,先转换后分层是制度变革的主要模式,这说明了制度之间的一致性在为大规模能源转型创造条件方面的重要性,以及保持制度层次之间一致性的界限的重要性。政府可以通过有效的体制安排转换和分层,最大限度地缩小转型意图与成果之间的潜在差距,但当体制变革为现有政策范式引入新的参与者或能源领域时,分层挑战就会出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信