Objective assessment of learning outcomes: Peculiarities of design and application of assessment tools in modern conditions of digital development

V.Yu. Abramova, A. K. Veksler, Elena N. Glubokova, T. S. Nazmutdinova, Regina Ivanovna Popova, E. P. Chernyshova, Olga Andreevna Shelukhina, I. Kalabina
{"title":"Objective assessment of learning outcomes: Peculiarities of design and application of assessment tools in modern conditions of digital development","authors":"V.Yu. Abramova, A. K. Veksler, Elena N. Glubokova, T. S. Nazmutdinova, Regina Ivanovna Popova, E. P. Chernyshova, Olga Andreevna Shelukhina, I. Kalabina","doi":"10.15293/2658-6762.2401.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article deals with the problem of designing and application of assessment tools in the context of objective assessment of learning outcomes in higher education. The aim of the article is to identify the peculiarities of design and application of assessment tools in modern conditions of digital development for the objective assessment of learning outcomes. Materials and Methods. In order to achieve the purpose of the research, the authors used theoretical (analysis of theoretical sources) and empirical (survey of 222 teachers) methods. The data obtained were subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results. The authors analyzed the approaches to the interpretation of assessment procedures and means in theoretical studies and regulatory documents. The main results of the study allowed to identify a number of problems in the development of assessment tools banks: substitution of the subject of the assessment for the knowledge component; orientation to the development of assessment materials at the discipline level; assessment of the validity and reliability of the designed assessment tools; assessment of teachers’ labor input; the ratio of the used template assessment tools and practical tasks; difficulties in the design of interdisciplinary assessment tools and competence assessment in general; underestimation of the potential of digital environment in the development of assessment tools. Evaluating the problems of designing and applying assessment tools by teachers depended on the subject area they teach and their experience of participation in the development of assessment tools at various levels. The dependence on teachers’professional experience and the position held has not been revealed. Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, conclusions about the types of problems in designing and application of assessment tools in modern conditions are drawn. Practical recommendations are provided.","PeriodicalId":21621,"journal":{"name":"Science for Education Today","volume":"24 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science for Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2401.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article deals with the problem of designing and application of assessment tools in the context of objective assessment of learning outcomes in higher education. The aim of the article is to identify the peculiarities of design and application of assessment tools in modern conditions of digital development for the objective assessment of learning outcomes. Materials and Methods. In order to achieve the purpose of the research, the authors used theoretical (analysis of theoretical sources) and empirical (survey of 222 teachers) methods. The data obtained were subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results. The authors analyzed the approaches to the interpretation of assessment procedures and means in theoretical studies and regulatory documents. The main results of the study allowed to identify a number of problems in the development of assessment tools banks: substitution of the subject of the assessment for the knowledge component; orientation to the development of assessment materials at the discipline level; assessment of the validity and reliability of the designed assessment tools; assessment of teachers’ labor input; the ratio of the used template assessment tools and practical tasks; difficulties in the design of interdisciplinary assessment tools and competence assessment in general; underestimation of the potential of digital environment in the development of assessment tools. Evaluating the problems of designing and applying assessment tools by teachers depended on the subject area they teach and their experience of participation in the development of assessment tools at various levels. The dependence on teachers’professional experience and the position held has not been revealed. Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, conclusions about the types of problems in designing and application of assessment tools in modern conditions are drawn. Practical recommendations are provided.
学习成果的客观评估:在现代数字化发展条件下设计和应用评估工具的特殊性
导言本文论述了在对高等教育学习成果进行客观评估的背景下设计和应用评估工具的问题。文章旨在确定在现代数字化发展条件下设计和应用评估工具的特殊性,以便对学习成果进行客观评估。材料与方法。为了实现研究目的,作者采用了理论(分析理论来源)和实证(对 222 名教师进行调查)方法。对获得的数据进行了定量和定性分析。研究结果作者分析了理论研究和规范性文件中解释评估程序和手段的方法。研究的主要结果有助于发现在开发评估工具库方面存在的一些问题:以知识部分取代评估主题;在学科层面开发评估材料的方向;评估所设计评估工具的有效性和可靠性;评估教师的劳动投入;所使用的模板评估工具和实际任务的比例;在设计跨学科评估工具和一般能力评估方面存在的困难;在开发评估工具方面低估了数字环境的潜力。评估教师设计和应用评估工具的问题取决于他们所教的学科领域和他们参与开发各 级评估工具的经验。对教师的专业经验和所担任职务的依赖还没有显示出来。结论根据研究结果,得出了在现代条件下设计和应用评估工具的问题类型。并提出了切实可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信