Examining the impact of different street classification scenarios on active transportation equity. Insights from Athens, Greece

IF 0.5 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING
Stefanos Tsigdinos
{"title":"Examining the impact of different street classification scenarios on active transportation equity. Insights from Athens, Greece","authors":"Stefanos Tsigdinos","doi":"10.5614/jpwk.2024.35.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transport equity is an essential characteristic of a just city and a concept related to social inclusion. This study examined how different street classification scenarios will affect active transportation equity. Four different scenarios with different planning rationales were developed that reformulate the street classification in a municipality within a metropolitan area, i.e., Kallithea in Athens, Greece. These scenarios give rise to new street categories that reallocate street space favoring active transport users. The evaluation of active transportation equity was carried out by utilizing spatial analysis and welfare economics through the lens of egalitarian and sufficientarian approaches. Based on the results, scenarios that propose new urban centers as well as a readable street classification with traffic calming zones determined by ring roads seem to be more efficient in accommodating vulnerable users in an equitable way. Hence, new planning schemes should rely on active modes, leaving automobiles behind. In general, measuring the impact of street classification scenarios through the lens of equity is critical for improving the quality of life in cities. Additionally, it is noteworthy knowledge for policy makers, planners, and local administrators. Finally, this research may inspire new studies, enriching the scientific debate.","PeriodicalId":41870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regional and City Planning","volume":" 60","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regional and City Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2024.35.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transport equity is an essential characteristic of a just city and a concept related to social inclusion. This study examined how different street classification scenarios will affect active transportation equity. Four different scenarios with different planning rationales were developed that reformulate the street classification in a municipality within a metropolitan area, i.e., Kallithea in Athens, Greece. These scenarios give rise to new street categories that reallocate street space favoring active transport users. The evaluation of active transportation equity was carried out by utilizing spatial analysis and welfare economics through the lens of egalitarian and sufficientarian approaches. Based on the results, scenarios that propose new urban centers as well as a readable street classification with traffic calming zones determined by ring roads seem to be more efficient in accommodating vulnerable users in an equitable way. Hence, new planning schemes should rely on active modes, leaving automobiles behind. In general, measuring the impact of street classification scenarios through the lens of equity is critical for improving the quality of life in cities. Additionally, it is noteworthy knowledge for policy makers, planners, and local administrators. Finally, this research may inspire new studies, enriching the scientific debate.
研究不同街道分类方案对主动交通公平性的影响。希腊雅典的启示
交通公平是一个公正城市的基本特征,也是一个与社会包容相关的概念。本研究探讨了不同的街道分类方案将如何影响主动交通公平性。研究人员根据不同的规划原理,制定了四种不同的方案,重新制定了大都市区内一个城市(即希腊雅典的卡利西亚)的街道分类。这些方案产生了新的街道类别,重新分配了街道空间,有利于主动交通使用者。通过平等主义和充分主义方法的视角,利用空间分析和福利经济学对主动交通的公平性进行了评估。根据研究结果,提出新城市中心以及可读街道分类和由环路决定的交通疏导区的方案,似乎更能有效地以公平的方式容纳弱势用户。因此,新的规划方案应依靠主动模式,将汽车抛在身后。总之,从公平的角度来衡量街道分类方案的影响,对于提高城市生活质量至关重要。此外,对于政策制定者、规划者和地方管理者来说,这也是值得注意的知识。最后,这项研究可能会激发新的研究,丰富科学辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Regional and City Planning
Journal of Regional and City Planning REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信