An investigation of K–12 teachers' perception and use of differentiated instruction based on qualification, training, and experience

Mariyam Shareefa, Visal Moosa, Wong Chee Hoo
{"title":"An investigation of K–12 teachers' perception and use of differentiated instruction based on qualification, training, and experience","authors":"Mariyam Shareefa, Visal Moosa, Wong Chee Hoo","doi":"10.18488/61.v12i2.3683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of the current study are to examine the levels of teachers’ perception and implementation of differentiated instruction (DI) and investigate the difference between teachers’ perception and the implementation of DI based on their qualifications, training in teaching students with special educational needs (SEN) and teaching experience. By employing a cross-sectional design, this study administered a survey to select 262 K–12 teachers working in Maldivian schools. Descriptive statistics including cross-tabulation were used in this study as the method of data analysis. Findings revealed that, for both perception and implementation of DI, the majority of teachers (52.8% and 52.3%, respectively) scored higher than the average. With respect to teachers’ perception, the results indicate that the majority of those who have a master’s level qualification (47.1%) had a low level of perception, while the vast majority of those who had specialized SEN training (75.0%) had a higher level of perception. With regard to implementation, unlike teachers with a bachelor’s degree or diploma level qualifications, the majority of those who have a master’s level qualification had a higher level of implementation (57.1%). Moreover, teachers who had specialized in SEN training had a higher level of implementation (66.7%), while the majority of the most experienced teachers had a lower level of implementation (51.3%). These findings confirm the importance of teachers’ continuous professional development, especially those who teach in high key-stage classes.","PeriodicalId":505988,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Practice","volume":" 76","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v12i2.3683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purposes of the current study are to examine the levels of teachers’ perception and implementation of differentiated instruction (DI) and investigate the difference between teachers’ perception and the implementation of DI based on their qualifications, training in teaching students with special educational needs (SEN) and teaching experience. By employing a cross-sectional design, this study administered a survey to select 262 K–12 teachers working in Maldivian schools. Descriptive statistics including cross-tabulation were used in this study as the method of data analysis. Findings revealed that, for both perception and implementation of DI, the majority of teachers (52.8% and 52.3%, respectively) scored higher than the average. With respect to teachers’ perception, the results indicate that the majority of those who have a master’s level qualification (47.1%) had a low level of perception, while the vast majority of those who had specialized SEN training (75.0%) had a higher level of perception. With regard to implementation, unlike teachers with a bachelor’s degree or diploma level qualifications, the majority of those who have a master’s level qualification had a higher level of implementation (57.1%). Moreover, teachers who had specialized in SEN training had a higher level of implementation (66.7%), while the majority of the most experienced teachers had a lower level of implementation (51.3%). These findings confirm the importance of teachers’ continuous professional development, especially those who teach in high key-stage classes.
根据资格、培训和经验调查 K-12 教师对差异化教学的认识和使用情况
本研究的目的是考察教师对差异化教学(DI)的认知和实施水平,并根据教师的资历、教授有特殊教育需求学生(SEN)的培训和教学经验,调查教师对差异化教学的认知和实施之间的差异。本研究采用横断面设计,对在马尔代夫学校工作的 262 名 K-12 级教师进行了调查。本研究采用包括交叉表在内的描述性统计作为数据分析方法。调查结果显示,大多数教师(分别为 52.8%和 52.3%)对 DI 的认知和实施均高于平均水平。在教师的认知方面,结果表明,大多数具有硕士学位的教师(47.1%)的认知水平较低,而绝大多数受过特殊教育需要专业培训的教师(75.0%)的认知水平较高。在实施方面,与拥有学士学位或文凭的教师不同,大多数拥有硕士学位的教师(57.1%)有较高的实施水平。此外,专门从事特殊教育需要培训的教师的实施水平较高(66.7%),而大多数最有经验的教师的实施水平较低(51.3%)。这些研究结果证实了教师持续专业发展的重要性,尤其是那些在高关键阶段班级任教的教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信