Kamala Harris and Mike Pence Personal and Social Deixis Analysis in US Vice Presidential Debate

Nadia Agatha Pramesthi
{"title":"Kamala Harris and Mike Pence Personal and Social Deixis Analysis in US Vice Presidential Debate","authors":"Nadia Agatha Pramesthi","doi":"10.24071/ijels.v10i1.3652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personal and social deixis have been the key factors in how people can engage in a conversation or discourse. From Hamdaoui (2015), it is known that deixis is one of the linguistic techniques that politicians emphasize a lot. Any linguistic theory can study it, but pragmatics must since it informs the analyst about the context of language production, including who is speaking, to whom, when, and where (Triki, 2010). Thus, this study used personal and social deixis theory in modern linguistics to answer several research questions, such as what deixis the candidates use and what are the effects. The research aims to see how each candidate effectively draws people’s attention in a presidential debate through the analysis of social deixis. Kamala Harris chooses to be more populist by using expressions such as exclusive ‘we’ or ‘us’ and ‘you’. Meanwhile, Mike Pence focuses on presenting himself and Trump through the use of expressions such as I and inclusive ‘we’ or ‘us’. Moreover, the distant relationship with Trump’s Administration that Kamala Harris has shown to the public can be a factor in how Americans see Joe and Kamala as different figures from their predecessors.","PeriodicalId":406723,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS)","volume":" 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v10i1.3652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal and social deixis have been the key factors in how people can engage in a conversation or discourse. From Hamdaoui (2015), it is known that deixis is one of the linguistic techniques that politicians emphasize a lot. Any linguistic theory can study it, but pragmatics must since it informs the analyst about the context of language production, including who is speaking, to whom, when, and where (Triki, 2010). Thus, this study used personal and social deixis theory in modern linguistics to answer several research questions, such as what deixis the candidates use and what are the effects. The research aims to see how each candidate effectively draws people’s attention in a presidential debate through the analysis of social deixis. Kamala Harris chooses to be more populist by using expressions such as exclusive ‘we’ or ‘us’ and ‘you’. Meanwhile, Mike Pence focuses on presenting himself and Trump through the use of expressions such as I and inclusive ‘we’ or ‘us’. Moreover, the distant relationship with Trump’s Administration that Kamala Harris has shown to the public can be a factor in how Americans see Joe and Kamala as different figures from their predecessors.
卡马拉-哈里斯和迈克-彭斯在美国副总统辩论中的个人与社会差异分析
个人和社会语助词一直是人们如何参与对话或话语的关键因素。从 Hamdaoui(2015 年)的研究中可以得知,语助词是政治家非常强调的语言技巧之一。任何语言学理论都可以研究它,但语用学必须研究它,因为它能让分析者了解语言产生的语境,包括谁在说话、对谁说话、何时何地说话(Triki,2010 年)。因此,本研究使用现代语言学中的个人和社会词缀理论来回答几个研究问题,如考生使用了哪些词缀以及效果如何。本研究旨在通过对社会语助词的分析,了解每位候选人在总统辩论中如何有效地吸引人们的注意力。卡马拉-哈里斯(Kamala Harris)选择使用 "我们 "或 "我们 "和 "你们 "等排他性表达方式,从而更加民粹化。与此同时,迈克-彭斯则通过使用 "我 "和包容性的 "我们 "或 "我们 "等表达方式,着重表现自己和特朗普的关系。此外,卡马拉-哈里斯向公众展示的与特朗普政府的疏远关系也可能是美国人将乔和卡马拉视为不同于其前任的人物的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信