Taxonomic resolution of different 16S rRNA variable regions varies strongly across plant-associated bacteria.

IF 5.1 Q1 ECOLOGY
ISME communications Pub Date : 2024-03-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ismeco/ycae034
Katarina Hrovat, Bas E Dutilh, Marnix H Medema, Chrats Melkonian
{"title":"Taxonomic resolution of different 16S rRNA variable regions varies strongly across plant-associated bacteria.","authors":"Katarina Hrovat, Bas E Dutilh, Marnix H Medema, Chrats Melkonian","doi":"10.1093/ismeco/ycae034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant-microbiome research plays a pivotal role in understanding the relationships between plants and their associated microbial communities, with implications for agriculture and ecosystem dynamics. Metabarcoding analysis on variable regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene remains the dominant technology to study microbiome diversity in this field. However, the choice of the targeted variable region might affect the outcome of the microbiome studies. In our <i>in silico</i> analysis, we have evaluated whether the targeted variable region has an impact on taxonomic resolution in 16 plant-related microbial genera. Through a comparison of 16S rRNA gene variable regions with whole-genome data, our findings suggest that the V1-V3 region is generally a more suitable option than the widely used V3-V4 region for targeting microbiome analysis in plant-related genera. However, sole reliance on one region could introduce detection biases for specific genera. Thus, we are suggesting that while transitioning to full-length 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequencing for plant-microbiome analysis, the usage of genus-specific variable regions can achieve more precise taxonomic assignments. More broadly, our approach provides a blueprint to identify the most discriminating variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene for genera of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":73516,"journal":{"name":"ISME communications","volume":"4 1","pages":"ycae034"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10980831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycae034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant-microbiome research plays a pivotal role in understanding the relationships between plants and their associated microbial communities, with implications for agriculture and ecosystem dynamics. Metabarcoding analysis on variable regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene remains the dominant technology to study microbiome diversity in this field. However, the choice of the targeted variable region might affect the outcome of the microbiome studies. In our in silico analysis, we have evaluated whether the targeted variable region has an impact on taxonomic resolution in 16 plant-related microbial genera. Through a comparison of 16S rRNA gene variable regions with whole-genome data, our findings suggest that the V1-V3 region is generally a more suitable option than the widely used V3-V4 region for targeting microbiome analysis in plant-related genera. However, sole reliance on one region could introduce detection biases for specific genera. Thus, we are suggesting that while transitioning to full-length 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequencing for plant-microbiome analysis, the usage of genus-specific variable regions can achieve more precise taxonomic assignments. More broadly, our approach provides a blueprint to identify the most discriminating variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene for genera of interest.

植物相关细菌不同 16S rRNA 可变区的分类分辨率差异很大。
植物微生物组研究在了解植物与其相关微生物群落之间的关系方面发挥着关键作用,对农业和生态系统动态具有重要影响。对 16S 核糖体 RNA(rRNA)基因的可变区进行元条码分析仍然是该领域研究微生物组多样性的主流技术。然而,目标可变区的选择可能会影响微生物组研究的结果。在硅学分析中,我们评估了目标可变区是否会影响 16 个植物相关微生物属的分类分辨率。通过比较 16S rRNA 基因可变区与全基因组数据,我们的研究结果表明,与广泛使用的 V3-V4 区相比,V1-V3 区通常更适合用于植物相关属微生物组的目标分析。不过,仅仅依靠一个区域可能会对特定菌属造成检测偏差。因此,我们建议,在过渡到全长 16S rRNA 基因和全基因组测序进行植物微生物组分析的同时,使用种属特异性可变区可以实现更精确的分类分配。更广泛地说,我们的方法为确定 16S rRNA 基因中对相关属最具鉴别力的可变区提供了一个蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信