Manejo del dolor crónico no oncológico con programas multicomponentes de terapias no farmacológicas: revisión sistemática de la literatura

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
M.V. Ruiz Romero , E. Lobato Parra , A. Porrúa del Saz , M.B. Martínez Monrobé , C.M. Pereira Delgado , M.B. Gómez Hernández
{"title":"Manejo del dolor crónico no oncológico con programas multicomponentes de terapias no farmacológicas: revisión sistemática de la literatura","authors":"M.V. Ruiz Romero ,&nbsp;E. Lobato Parra ,&nbsp;A. Porrúa del Saz ,&nbsp;M.B. Martínez Monrobé ,&nbsp;C.M. Pereira Delgado ,&nbsp;M.B. Gómez Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chronic pain is a public health problem suffered by 20% of the world's population. Pharmacological approaches are insufficient, so a multi-therapeutic approach that also includes non-pharmacological therapies (psychological therapies, meditation, physical exercise, healthy habits, etc.) is proposed. The aim of this review was to review the existing scientific evidence on the effect of multicomponent programs with non-pharmacological therapies in people with chronic non-oncologic pain. To this end, a search for scientific articles was carried out in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO) and 17 articles were selected, following the PRISMA recommendations. The patients who participated in these programs were mostly women, aged 18 to 80<!--> <!-->years, working or on sick leave due to pain, with secondary education or less and married. The most frequent pain was musculoskeletal, mainly low back pain. All the articles studied the effectiveness of two or more therapies, highlighting psychological therapies, physical exercise and education. Positive results were obtained in the reduction of different variables such as pain, pain catastrophizing, anxiety and depression, in addition to improving functionality and quality of life. It has also been shown that patients’ prior expectations regarding the intervention influence its effectiveness. Although throughout the review there was great heterogeneity in the interventions, in the evaluation methods and in the results themselves, it can be concluded that multicomponent programs show positive results in the management of chronic pain, and should therefore be incorporated as a routine therapeutic treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647924000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pain is a public health problem suffered by 20% of the world's population. Pharmacological approaches are insufficient, so a multi-therapeutic approach that also includes non-pharmacological therapies (psychological therapies, meditation, physical exercise, healthy habits, etc.) is proposed. The aim of this review was to review the existing scientific evidence on the effect of multicomponent programs with non-pharmacological therapies in people with chronic non-oncologic pain. To this end, a search for scientific articles was carried out in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO) and 17 articles were selected, following the PRISMA recommendations. The patients who participated in these programs were mostly women, aged 18 to 80 years, working or on sick leave due to pain, with secondary education or less and married. The most frequent pain was musculoskeletal, mainly low back pain. All the articles studied the effectiveness of two or more therapies, highlighting psychological therapies, physical exercise and education. Positive results were obtained in the reduction of different variables such as pain, pain catastrophizing, anxiety and depression, in addition to improving functionality and quality of life. It has also been shown that patients’ prior expectations regarding the intervention influence its effectiveness. Although throughout the review there was great heterogeneity in the interventions, in the evaluation methods and in the results themselves, it can be concluded that multicomponent programs show positive results in the management of chronic pain, and should therefore be incorporated as a routine therapeutic treatment.

[通过使用非药物疗法的多成分方案管理慢性非肿瘤性疼痛:文献系统回顾]。
慢性疼痛是一个公共健康问题,全球有 20% 的人口深受其害。药物治疗是不够的,因此有人提出了包括非药物疗法(心理疗法、冥想、体育锻炼、健康习惯等)在内的多种治疗方法。本综述的目的是回顾现有的科学证据,了解在慢性非肿瘤性疼痛患者中采用非药物疗法的多成分方案的效果。为此,我们在三个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO)中搜索了科学文章,并按照 PRISMA 建议筛选出 17 篇文章。参与这些计划的患者大多为女性,年龄在 18 至 80 岁之间,因疼痛而工作或请病假,受过中等或以下教育,已婚。最常见的疼痛是肌肉骨骼疼痛,主要是腰背痛。所有文章都对两种或两种以上疗法的有效性进行了研究,重点是心理疗法、体育锻炼和教育。在减少疼痛、疼痛灾难化、焦虑和抑郁等不同变量方面取得了积极成果,此外还改善了功能和生活质量。研究还表明,患者之前对干预措施的期望会影响其效果。虽然在整个综述中,干预措施、评估方法和结果本身都存在很大的差异,但可以得出的结论是,多成分方案在慢性疼痛的治疗中显示出积极的效果,因此应将其作为常规治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信