Performance controls and accountability in African transport infrastructure megaprojects: A systematic literature review

Jackson Sekasi, Steven Harrod, Victor Andrade, Jacob. H. Madsen
{"title":"Performance controls and accountability in African transport infrastructure megaprojects: A systematic literature review","authors":"Jackson Sekasi,&nbsp;Steven Harrod,&nbsp;Victor Andrade,&nbsp;Jacob. H. Madsen","doi":"10.1016/j.plas.2024.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Poor performance is common in the delivery of large-scale transport infrastructure. Despite previous studies examining the management of transport megaprojects, there is a lack of systematic reviews on performance Controls and Accountability in Megaprojects (CAMP). We analyze research on CAMP in Africa. Out of the 947 records retrieved, 35 articles published between 1980 and 2022 meet our inclusion criteria. We identify four main research themes: “project governance,” “performance management,” “project conceptual management,” and “complexity management.” Our findings indicate significant weaknesses in project governance and a lack of proper project conception. Practical implications involve restructuring project governance policies and implementing a multi-level project governance model. The research supports recognizing corruption as a characteristic of megaprojects, implementing project governance as a standard management practice, and improving governance in public-private partnerships. Additionally, future research should prioritize integrating and developing policies, strengthening institutions, implementing participatory governance mechanisms, and building capacity for project management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101050,"journal":{"name":"Project Leadership and Society","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000085/pdfft?md5=6badea263a712827b6ca415d788a189c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666721524000085-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Project Leadership and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721524000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor performance is common in the delivery of large-scale transport infrastructure. Despite previous studies examining the management of transport megaprojects, there is a lack of systematic reviews on performance Controls and Accountability in Megaprojects (CAMP). We analyze research on CAMP in Africa. Out of the 947 records retrieved, 35 articles published between 1980 and 2022 meet our inclusion criteria. We identify four main research themes: “project governance,” “performance management,” “project conceptual management,” and “complexity management.” Our findings indicate significant weaknesses in project governance and a lack of proper project conception. Practical implications involve restructuring project governance policies and implementing a multi-level project governance model. The research supports recognizing corruption as a characteristic of megaprojects, implementing project governance as a standard management practice, and improving governance in public-private partnerships. Additionally, future research should prioritize integrating and developing policies, strengthening institutions, implementing participatory governance mechanisms, and building capacity for project management.

非洲运输基础设施大型项目的绩效控制和问责制:系统文献综述
在大型运输基础设施的交付过程中,绩效不佳是很常见的现象。尽管以前对大型运输项目的管理进行过研究,但缺乏对大型项目绩效控制与问责(CAMP)的系统性审查。我们对非洲有关 CAMP 的研究进行了分析。在检索到的 947 条记录中,1980 年至 2022 年间发表的 35 篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。我们确定了四个主要研究主题:"项目管理"、"绩效管理"、"项目概念管理 "和 "复杂性管理"。我们的研究结果表明,项目管理存在重大缺陷,缺乏正确的项目概念。实际影响包括调整项目管理政策和实施多层次的项目管理模式。研究支持将腐败视为巨型项目的一个特征,将项目治理作为一种标准管理实践来实施,并改善公私合作伙伴关系中的治理。此外,今后的研究应优先考虑整合和制定政策、加强机构建设、实施参与式治理机制以及提高项目管理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信