Understanding the manufacturing reshoring decision-making content through the lens of the Eclectic Paradigm: a systematic literature review

IF 4 Q2 BUSINESS
Haihan Li, Per Hilletofth, David Eriksson, Wendy Tate
{"title":"Understanding the manufacturing reshoring decision-making content through the lens of the Eclectic Paradigm: a systematic literature review","authors":"Haihan Li, Per Hilletofth, David Eriksson, Wendy Tate","doi":"10.1108/ebr-10-2023-0300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to investigate the manufacturing reshoring decision-making content from an Eclectic Paradigm perspective.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Data were collected through a six-step systematic literature review on factors influencing manufacturing reshoring decision-making. The review is based on 100 peer-reviewed journal papers discussing reshoring decision-making contents published from 2009 to 2022.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>In total, 80 decision factors were extracted and then categorized into resource-seeking (8%), market-seeking (11%), efficiency-seeking (41%) and strategic asset-seeking (16%) advantages. Additionally, 24% of these were identified as hybrid, which means that they were classified into multiple categories. Some decision factors were further identified as reshoring influencing factors (i.e. drivers, enablers and barriers).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Scholars need to consider what other theories can be used or developed to identify and evaluate the decision factors (determinants) of manufacturing reshoring as well as how currently adopted theory can be further advanced to create clearer and comprehensive theoretical frameworks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This research underscores the importance of developing clearer and more comprehensive theoretical frameworks. For practitioners, understanding the multifaceted nature of decision factors could enhance strategic decision-making regarding reshoring initiatives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the value and practicality of the Eclectic Paradigm in categorizing factors in manufacturing reshoring decision-making content and presents in-depth theoretical classifications. In addition, it bridges the gap between decision factors and influencing factors in the decision-making content research realm.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47867,"journal":{"name":"European Business Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2023-0300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the manufacturing reshoring decision-making content from an Eclectic Paradigm perspective.

Design/methodology/approach

Data were collected through a six-step systematic literature review on factors influencing manufacturing reshoring decision-making. The review is based on 100 peer-reviewed journal papers discussing reshoring decision-making contents published from 2009 to 2022.

Findings

In total, 80 decision factors were extracted and then categorized into resource-seeking (8%), market-seeking (11%), efficiency-seeking (41%) and strategic asset-seeking (16%) advantages. Additionally, 24% of these were identified as hybrid, which means that they were classified into multiple categories. Some decision factors were further identified as reshoring influencing factors (i.e. drivers, enablers and barriers).

Research limitations/implications

Scholars need to consider what other theories can be used or developed to identify and evaluate the decision factors (determinants) of manufacturing reshoring as well as how currently adopted theory can be further advanced to create clearer and comprehensive theoretical frameworks.

Practical implications

This research underscores the importance of developing clearer and more comprehensive theoretical frameworks. For practitioners, understanding the multifaceted nature of decision factors could enhance strategic decision-making regarding reshoring initiatives.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the value and practicality of the Eclectic Paradigm in categorizing factors in manufacturing reshoring decision-making content and presents in-depth theoretical classifications. In addition, it bridges the gap between decision factors and influencing factors in the decision-making content research realm.

从折衷主义范式的视角了解制造业重新定位的决策内容:系统性文献综述
目的 本研究旨在从折衷范式的角度研究制造业重新定位的决策内容。设计/方法/途径 通过对影响制造业重新定位决策的因素进行六步系统文献综述,收集数据。研究结果共提取了 80 个决策因素,并将其分为资源寻求优势(8%)、市场寻求优势(11%)、效率寻求优势(41%)和战略资产寻求优势(16%)。此外,其中 24% 的优势被确定为混合优势,即被划分为多个类别。研究局限/启示学者们需要考虑还可以使用或发展哪些其他理论来识别和评估制造业转移的决策因素(决定因素),以及如何进一步推进当前采用的理论,以创建更清晰、更全面的理论框架。就从业人员而言,了解决策因素的多面性可以加强有关重新定位举措的战略决策。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项研究,探讨了折衷主义范式在制造业重新定位决策内容的因素分类中的价值和实用性,并提出了深入的理论分类。此外,它还填补了决策内容研究领域中决策因素与影响因素之间的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Articles should cover the key business disciplines - management, leadership, marketing, logistics, strategy, quality management, entrepreneurship, business ethics, international business, operations management, manufacturing, accounting and finance - specifically relating to experiences and reflections of interest to business and academia worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信