Modeling airport choice for a multi-airport area using a random parameter logit model

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rubén Cordera , Luigi dell’Olio , Silvia Sipone , José Luis Moura
{"title":"Modeling airport choice for a multi-airport area using a random parameter logit model","authors":"Rubén Cordera ,&nbsp;Luigi dell’Olio ,&nbsp;Silvia Sipone ,&nbsp;José Luis Moura","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent years have seen a growing demand for air transport which has led to an increase in the number of airports providing a significant number of flights in Spain and throughout the rest of Europe. Choosing which airport to use depends on the competition between the airlines operating from them and how accessible they are to the residents in the surrounding areas. This research introduces an efficient design based on D-error using a stated preferences survey to study user behaviour when choosing between competing airports. The data is modelled using a Multinomial Logit Model and a Random Parameter Error Component Logit (RPECL), a discrete choice model which allows us to study user preferences taking into account their varying systemic and random tastes, as well as find specific correlations which may exist between similar alternatives. This meant the authors were also able to calculate the direct and cross elasticities to examine the weight of the different variables involved in making the choice of airport. The results showed, for a study case in Spain (Bilbao and Seve Ballesteros - Santander airports), that increased access time to the furthest airport caused an important fall in demand (choice) for that airport. It was also shown that access fees had a lower elasticity than the flight cost and that the fewer the transfers required to reach the final destination increased the probability of choosing an airport. Therefore, in order for smaller airports to compete with larger airports they need to invest more in reducing the cost of flights, attracting more low-cost companies and offering more direct complementary destinations than those provided by larger airports.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 101427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000222/pdfft?md5=a5688cdc31a5a5be17319b9ae4f97ee6&pid=1-s2.0-S0739885924000222-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885924000222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have seen a growing demand for air transport which has led to an increase in the number of airports providing a significant number of flights in Spain and throughout the rest of Europe. Choosing which airport to use depends on the competition between the airlines operating from them and how accessible they are to the residents in the surrounding areas. This research introduces an efficient design based on D-error using a stated preferences survey to study user behaviour when choosing between competing airports. The data is modelled using a Multinomial Logit Model and a Random Parameter Error Component Logit (RPECL), a discrete choice model which allows us to study user preferences taking into account their varying systemic and random tastes, as well as find specific correlations which may exist between similar alternatives. This meant the authors were also able to calculate the direct and cross elasticities to examine the weight of the different variables involved in making the choice of airport. The results showed, for a study case in Spain (Bilbao and Seve Ballesteros - Santander airports), that increased access time to the furthest airport caused an important fall in demand (choice) for that airport. It was also shown that access fees had a lower elasticity than the flight cost and that the fewer the transfers required to reach the final destination increased the probability of choosing an airport. Therefore, in order for smaller airports to compete with larger airports they need to invest more in reducing the cost of flights, attracting more low-cost companies and offering more direct complementary destinations than those provided by larger airports.

利用随机参数 logit 模型为多机场地区的机场选择建模
近年来,人们对航空运输的需求不断增长,导致西班牙和欧洲其他国家提供大量航班的机场数量增加。选择使用哪个机场取决于在这些机场运营的航空公司之间的竞争以及这些机场对周边地区居民的交通便利程度。本研究采用基于 D-error 的有效设计,利用陈述偏好调查来研究用户在竞争机场之间进行选择时的行为。数据建模采用了多项式 Logit 模型和随机参数误差分量 Logit (RPECL),这是一种离散选择模型,可让我们在研究用户偏好时考虑到其不同的系统性和随机口味,并发现类似替代品之间可能存在的特定相关性。这意味着作者还能计算直接弹性和交叉弹性,以研究不同变量在机场选择中的权重。结果表明,在西班牙的一个研究案例(毕尔巴鄂机场和塞维-巴列斯特罗斯-桑坦德机场)中,通往最远机场的时间增加导致对该机场的需求(选择)大幅下降。研究还表明,进入费的弹性低于飞行成本,而且到达最终目的地所需的转机次数越少,选择机场的概率就越大。因此,小型机场要想与大型机场竞争,就必须加大投资力度,降低航班成本,吸引更多的低成本公司,并提供比大型机场更多的直达补充目的地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信