Dietary and quality-of-life outcomes of the FoodFix intervention for addictive eating: a short report

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Rebecca Collins, Janelle Skinner, Mark Leary, Tracy L. Burrows
{"title":"Dietary and quality-of-life outcomes of the FoodFix intervention for addictive eating: a short report","authors":"Rebecca Collins,&nbsp;Janelle Skinner,&nbsp;Mark Leary,&nbsp;Tracy L. Burrows","doi":"10.1111/jhn.13300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Interest in addictive eating continues to grow from both a research and clinical perspective. To date, dietary assessment alongside food addiction status is limited, with management options for addictive eating behaviours variable, given the overlap with myriad conditions. The aim of this study was to report the dietary intake and quality-of-life outcomes from a personality-targeted motivational interviewing intervention delivered by dietitians using telehealth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study was conducted in adults exceeding their healthy-weight range with symptoms of addictive eating, as defined by the Yale Food Addiction Scale. The 52 participants were randomised to either intervention or control, with 49 participants commencing the intervention. Individuals participated in the 3-month, three-session FoodFix interventions, with dietary outcomes assessed by the Australian Eating Survey and quality of life assessed using the SF-36 at baseline and 3 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were small-to-moderate effect sizes, specifically in the intervention group for decreased added sugar intake, increased protein intake, increased meat quality and increased vegetable servings per day. Six out of eight quality-of-life domains had small-to-moderate effect sizes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This intervention has highlighted the need for further research in larger sample sizes to assess dietary behaviour change by those who self-report addictive eating.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"37 3","pages":"815-822"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Interest in addictive eating continues to grow from both a research and clinical perspective. To date, dietary assessment alongside food addiction status is limited, with management options for addictive eating behaviours variable, given the overlap with myriad conditions. The aim of this study was to report the dietary intake and quality-of-life outcomes from a personality-targeted motivational interviewing intervention delivered by dietitians using telehealth.

Methods

The study was conducted in adults exceeding their healthy-weight range with symptoms of addictive eating, as defined by the Yale Food Addiction Scale. The 52 participants were randomised to either intervention or control, with 49 participants commencing the intervention. Individuals participated in the 3-month, three-session FoodFix interventions, with dietary outcomes assessed by the Australian Eating Survey and quality of life assessed using the SF-36 at baseline and 3 months.

Results

There were small-to-moderate effect sizes, specifically in the intervention group for decreased added sugar intake, increased protein intake, increased meat quality and increased vegetable servings per day. Six out of eight quality-of-life domains had small-to-moderate effect sizes.

Conclusions

This intervention has highlighted the need for further research in larger sample sizes to assess dietary behaviour change by those who self-report addictive eating.

Abstract Image

针对饮食成瘾的 FoodFix 干预疗法的饮食和生活质量成果:简短报告。
背景:从研究和临床角度来看,人们对饮食成瘾的兴趣与日俱增。迄今为止,与食物成瘾状况同时进行的饮食评估非常有限,而且由于成瘾性饮食行为与多种疾病重叠,其管理方案也不尽相同。本研究的目的是报告营养师利用远程医疗技术提供的以人格为目标的动机访谈干预所产生的饮食摄入量和生活质量结果:这项研究的对象是超过健康体重范围、有耶鲁食物成瘾量表定义的饮食成瘾症状的成年人。52 名参与者被随机分配到干预组或对照组,其中 49 人开始接受干预。他们参加了为期 3 个月、分 3 次进行的 FoodFix 干预,饮食结果由澳大利亚饮食调查进行评估,生活质量则在基线和 3 个月时由 SF-36 进行评估:结果:干预组在减少添加糖摄入量、增加蛋白质摄入量、提高肉类质量和增加每日蔬菜份量等方面都有小到中等的效果。在八个生活质量领域中,有六个领域具有小到中等的效果:这项干预措施突出表明,有必要对更大样本量进行进一步研究,以评估自我报告饮食成瘾者的饮食行为变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信