The evolution of social-ecological systems (SES) research: a co-authorship and co-citation network analysis

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Amanda Manyani, Reinette Biggs, Lloyd Hill, Rika Preiser
{"title":"The evolution of social-ecological systems (SES) research: a co-authorship and co-citation network analysis","authors":"Amanda Manyani, Reinette Biggs, Lloyd Hill, Rika Preiser","doi":"10.5751/es-14694-290133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social-ecological systems (SES) research has gained substantial momentum, as witnessed by the growth in SES publications, theories, and frameworks, and the traction these concepts have gained in development and policy arenas. However, the growth and development of the SES field has only been partially examined, which limits our ability to make sense of and support the future development of the field and its ability to inform pressing sustainability challenges. The aim of this study is to understand how SES research has grown and changed over time as a field of study using bibliometric methods, co-authorship and co-citation network analysis. Our study is informed by broader bodies of work that have sought to understand the development of scientific fields, concepts, and research agendas. We highlight key trends that have influenced the organization of the field as well as how key thematic areas of SES research have evolved over time. Our results indicate that the research on SES is (i) mainly carried out by authors located in North America and Europe, (ii) characterized by changes in the terminology employed, as identified through our search terms, (iii) linked to the emergence of major conferences and centers dedicated to SES research, as well as its growth over time, (iv) characterized by a highly interconnected structure, with almost 80% of scholars being connected to each other, and (v) characterized by a shift in citation patterns, with newcomers in the network carving out their niche and replacing the founding figures as the central focus. We discuss the implications of these findings, including the nature of SES research as an “epistemic network,” the highly collaborative nature of SES research, and the role played by open-access journals in the growth of SES research in the digital era. We further suggest that the SES research field is at a critical transition point, with contending visions of its future following a more disciplinary path or remaining as a more open interdisciplinary space. We conclude with the questions this raises for future SES research regarding the implications of this duality on the nature, production, and validation of knowledge and its evolution.</p>\n<p>The post The evolution of social-ecological systems (SES) research: a co-authorship and co-citation network analysis first appeared on Ecology & Society.</p>","PeriodicalId":51028,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Society","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5751/es-14694-290133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social-ecological systems (SES) research has gained substantial momentum, as witnessed by the growth in SES publications, theories, and frameworks, and the traction these concepts have gained in development and policy arenas. However, the growth and development of the SES field has only been partially examined, which limits our ability to make sense of and support the future development of the field and its ability to inform pressing sustainability challenges. The aim of this study is to understand how SES research has grown and changed over time as a field of study using bibliometric methods, co-authorship and co-citation network analysis. Our study is informed by broader bodies of work that have sought to understand the development of scientific fields, concepts, and research agendas. We highlight key trends that have influenced the organization of the field as well as how key thematic areas of SES research have evolved over time. Our results indicate that the research on SES is (i) mainly carried out by authors located in North America and Europe, (ii) characterized by changes in the terminology employed, as identified through our search terms, (iii) linked to the emergence of major conferences and centers dedicated to SES research, as well as its growth over time, (iv) characterized by a highly interconnected structure, with almost 80% of scholars being connected to each other, and (v) characterized by a shift in citation patterns, with newcomers in the network carving out their niche and replacing the founding figures as the central focus. We discuss the implications of these findings, including the nature of SES research as an “epistemic network,” the highly collaborative nature of SES research, and the role played by open-access journals in the growth of SES research in the digital era. We further suggest that the SES research field is at a critical transition point, with contending visions of its future following a more disciplinary path or remaining as a more open interdisciplinary space. We conclude with the questions this raises for future SES research regarding the implications of this duality on the nature, production, and validation of knowledge and its evolution.

The post The evolution of social-ecological systems (SES) research: a co-authorship and co-citation network analysis first appeared on Ecology & Society.

社会生态系统(SES)研究的演变:共同作者和共同引用网络分析
社会-生态系统(SES)研究已经获得了巨大的发展势头,社会-生态系统出版物、理论和框架的增长,以及这些概念在发展和政策领域获得的牵引力都证明了这一点。然而,我们只对生态系统服务领域的增长和发展进行了部分研究,这限制了我们理解和支持该领域未来发展的能力,以及为紧迫的可持续发展挑战提供信息的能力。本研究旨在通过文献计量学方法、共同作者和共同引用网络分析,了解 SES 研究作为一个研究领域是如何随着时间的推移而成长和变化的。我们的研究借鉴了试图了解科学领域、概念和研究议程发展的更广泛的研究成果。我们强调了影响该领域组织的主要趋势,以及 SES 研究的主要专题领域是如何随着时间的推移而演变的。我们的研究结果表明,关于 SES 的研究 (i) 主要是由北美和欧洲的作者开展的,(ii) 其特点是所使用的术语发生了变化,正如我们通过搜索词所确定的那样,(iii) 与专门从事 SES 研究的大型会议和中心的出现有关、(iv)具有高度互联结构的特点,几乎 80% 的学者相互之间都有联系,(v)具有引文模式转变的特点,网络中的新来者正在开辟自己的利基,并取代创始者成为中心焦点。我们讨论了这些发现的意义,包括社会经济学研究作为 "认识论网络 "的性质、社会经济学研究的高度协作性以及开放获取期刊在数字时代社会经济学研究发展中所扮演的角色。我们进一步指出,社会经济学研究领域正处于一个关键的转型期,人们对其未来的愿景存在争议,是走一条学科性更强的道路,还是继续保持一个更加开放的跨学科空间。最后,我们提出了未来社会-生态系统研究中的一些问题,这些问题涉及这种二元性对知识的性质、生产和验证及其演变的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology and Society
Ecology and Society 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology and Society is an electronic, peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary journal devoted to the rapid dissemination of current research. Manuscript submission, peer review, and publication are all handled on the Internet. Software developed for the journal automates all clerical steps during peer review, facilitates a double-blind peer review process, and allows authors and editors to follow the progress of peer review on the Internet. As articles are accepted, they are published in an "Issue in Progress." At four month intervals the Issue-in-Progress is declared a New Issue, and subscribers receive the Table of Contents of the issue via email. Our turn-around time (submission to publication) averages around 350 days. We encourage publication of special features. Special features are comprised of a set of manuscripts that address a single theme, and include an introductory and summary manuscript. The individual contributions are published in regular issues, and the special feature manuscripts are linked through a table of contents and announced on the journal''s main page. The journal seeks papers that are novel, integrative and written in a way that is accessible to a wide audience that includes an array of disciplines from the natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities concerned with the relationship between society and the life-supporting ecosystems on which human wellbeing ultimately depends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信