Preparing Future Technical Editors for an Artificial Intelligence-enabled Workplace

IF 1.8 2区文学 Q3 BUSINESS

Journal of Business and Technical Communication Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1177/10506519241239950

Jennifer C. Mallette

引用次数: 0

Abstract

How should instructors adapt technical editing courses to account for generative artificial intelligence (AI)? This article addresses what generative AI means for technical editing pedagogy. While AI tools may be able to address rote editing tasks, expert editors are still needed to provide accessible, ethical, and justice-oriented edits. After reviewing impacts of generative AI on editing praxis, the author focuses on the microcredentials that she built into an editing course in order to address these impacts pedagogically. The goal was to enable students to understand AI, argue for their expertise, and edit from ethical and social justice perspectives.

查看原文本刊更多论文

让未来的技术编辑为人工智能工作场所做好准备

教师应如何调整技术编辑课程以适应生成式人工智能（AI）？本文探讨了生成式人工智能对技术编辑教学法的意义。虽然人工智能工具可能能够解决死记硬背的编辑任务，但仍需要专家编辑来提供无障碍、合乎道德和以正义为导向的编辑。在回顾了生成式人工智能对编辑实践的影响之后，作者重点介绍了她在编辑课程中建立的微证书，以便在教学上解决这些影响。其目的是让学生了解人工智能，论证自己的专业知识，并从伦理和社会正义的角度进行编辑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Business and Technical Communication Multiple-

CiteScore

5.10

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： JBTC is a refereed journal that provides a forum for discussion of communication practices, problems, and trends in business, professional, scientific, and governmental fields. As such, JBTC offers opportunities for bridging dichotomies that have traditionally existed in professional communication journals between business and technical communication and between industrial and academic audiences. Because JBTC is designed to disseminate knowledge that can lead to improved communication practices in both academe and industry, the journal favors research that will inform professional communicators in both sectors. However, articles addressing one sector or the other will also be considered.