SLIP-RESISTANT CONNECTIONS. COMPARISON OF FRICTION AREAS IN SLIP FACTOR TEST SPECIMENS ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL CODES

ce/papers Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1002/cepa.3029
A. Fuente, M.A. Serrano-López, C. López-Colina, F. López-Gayarre
{"title":"SLIP-RESISTANT CONNECTIONS. COMPARISON OF FRICTION AREAS IN SLIP FACTOR TEST SPECIMENS ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL CODES","authors":"A. Fuente,&nbsp;M.A. Serrano-López,&nbsp;C. López-Colina,&nbsp;F. López-Gayarre","doi":"10.1002/cepa.3029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There are differences in the slip factor tests used in international codes. In many cases, different slip factors have been obtained for almost the same surfaces. The existing literature confirmed that the discrepancies could be due to different slip criteria, preload levels, measurement methods, etc. However, the specimens used in each test have not been dimension-ally compared. An analytical comparative study has been carried out comparing the friction disc of seven international codes. It has been verified if the differences found can be compensated with the different preloads indicated in each test. The results confirm that they are not, and that geometric differences are important in explaining the different slip factors.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100223,"journal":{"name":"ce/papers","volume":"7 1-2","pages":"124-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cepa.3029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ce/papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cepa.3029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are differences in the slip factor tests used in international codes. In many cases, different slip factors have been obtained for almost the same surfaces. The existing literature confirmed that the discrepancies could be due to different slip criteria, preload levels, measurement methods, etc. However, the specimens used in each test have not been dimension-ally compared. An analytical comparative study has been carried out comparing the friction disc of seven international codes. It has been verified if the differences found can be compensated with the different preloads indicated in each test. The results confirm that they are not, and that geometric differences are important in explaining the different slip factors.

防滑连接。根据国际规范比较滑移系数测试样本的摩擦区域
国际规范中使用的滑移系数测试存在差异。在许多情况下,几乎相同的表面会得到不同的滑移系数。现有文献证实,这些差异可能是由于不同的滑移标准、预紧力水平、测量方法等造成的。然而,每次测试中使用的试样都没有进行尺寸比较。我们对七种国际规范的摩擦片进行了分析比较研究。我们验证了所发现的差异是否可以通过每次测试中的不同预紧力得到补偿。结果证实不能,几何差异是解释不同滑移系数的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信