The validity of the selection methods for recruitment to UK core psychiatry training: cohort study.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Paul A Tiffin, Emma Morley, Lewis W Paton, Nandini Chakraborty, Fiona Patterson
{"title":"The validity of the selection methods for recruitment to UK core psychiatry training: cohort study.","authors":"Paul A Tiffin, Emma Morley, Lewis W Paton, Nandini Chakraborty, Fiona Patterson","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2024.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>Selection into core psychiatry training in the UK uses a computer-delivered Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA; a situational judgement and clinical problem-solving test) and, previously, a face-to-face Selection Centre. The Selection Centre assessments were suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the validity of this selection process using data on 3510 psychiatry applicants. We modelled the ability of the selection scores to predict subsequent performance in the Clinical Assessment of Skills and Competencies (CASC). Sensitivity to demographic characteristics was also estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All selection assessment scores demonstrated positive, statistically significant, independent relationships with CASC performance and were sensitive to demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>All selection components showed independent predictive validity. Re-instituting the Selection Centre assessments could be considered, although the costs, potential advantages and disadvantages should be weighed carefully.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and method: Selection into core psychiatry training in the UK uses a computer-delivered Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA; a situational judgement and clinical problem-solving test) and, previously, a face-to-face Selection Centre. The Selection Centre assessments were suspended during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the validity of this selection process using data on 3510 psychiatry applicants. We modelled the ability of the selection scores to predict subsequent performance in the Clinical Assessment of Skills and Competencies (CASC). Sensitivity to demographic characteristics was also estimated.

Results: All selection assessment scores demonstrated positive, statistically significant, independent relationships with CASC performance and were sensitive to demographic factors.

Implications: All selection components showed independent predictive validity. Re-instituting the Selection Centre assessments could be considered, although the costs, potential advantages and disadvantages should be weighed carefully.

英国核心精神病学培训招生选拔方法的有效性:队列研究。
目的和方法:在英国,核心精神病学培训的选拔采用计算机交付的多专业招聘评估(MSRA;一种情境判断和临床问题解决测试),以前则采用面对面的选拔中心评估。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,遴选中心评估暂停。我们的目的是利用 3510 名精神科申请人的数据来评估这一遴选过程的有效性。我们模拟了遴选分数预测后续临床技能和能力评估 (CASC) 成绩的能力。我们还估算了对人口统计学特征的敏感性:结果:所有遴选评估得分均与 CASC 成绩呈正相关,且在统计学上有显著的独立关系,并对人口统计学因素敏感:所有遴选内容都显示出独立的预测有效性。可以考虑重新引入遴选中心评估,但应仔细权衡成本和潜在的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信