Evaluation of technological tendencies in the carbon capture process: a review.

B. E. Tarazona-Romero, N. Y. Castillo-Leon, A. J. Rodriguez-Nieves, Y. P. Quizena-Fernandez, Y. C. Villabona-Niño, O. Forero-Caceres
{"title":"Evaluation of technological tendencies in the carbon capture process: a review.","authors":"B. E. Tarazona-Romero, N. Y. Castillo-Leon, A. J. Rodriguez-Nieves, Y. P. Quizena-Fernandez, Y. C. Villabona-Niño, O. Forero-Caceres","doi":"10.1088/1757-899x/1299/1/012012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper evaluates the technological trends in the carbon sequestration process. For this purpose, these systems have been classified into two subsystems: conventional technologies subsystem and emerging technologies subsystem. Each is explored for its suitability for meeting a set of six attributes. A bibliometric analysis process was developed using the Scopus database and VOSviewer Software to present the potential of each subsystem evaluated, through an evaluation matrix. The analysis of the subsystems and attributes was performed through the formal concept analysis methodology (8FCA). To facilitate the processing of the information, the open access software concept Explorer was used. The analysis shows that conventional technologies, despite their cost, will be maintained and advance in their implementation process. The bibliometric analysis integrated with the applied FCA methodology has proven to be useful for the evaluation of technological typologies and serves as an alternative to develop theoretical studies that group and link different options as a model to evaluate a deterministic set of attributes.","PeriodicalId":509593,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1299/1/012012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper evaluates the technological trends in the carbon sequestration process. For this purpose, these systems have been classified into two subsystems: conventional technologies subsystem and emerging technologies subsystem. Each is explored for its suitability for meeting a set of six attributes. A bibliometric analysis process was developed using the Scopus database and VOSviewer Software to present the potential of each subsystem evaluated, through an evaluation matrix. The analysis of the subsystems and attributes was performed through the formal concept analysis methodology (8FCA). To facilitate the processing of the information, the open access software concept Explorer was used. The analysis shows that conventional technologies, despite their cost, will be maintained and advance in their implementation process. The bibliometric analysis integrated with the applied FCA methodology has proven to be useful for the evaluation of technological typologies and serves as an alternative to develop theoretical studies that group and link different options as a model to evaluate a deterministic set of attributes.
碳捕集工艺技术趋势评估:综述。
本文评估了碳封存过程中的技术趋势。为此,这些系统被分为两个子系统:传统技术子系统和新兴技术子系统。每个子系统都探讨了其满足六项属性的适宜性。利用 Scopus 数据库和 VOSviewer 软件开发了一个文献计量分析程序,通过一个评估矩阵来展示每个被评估子系统的潜力。通过正式概念分析方法(8FCA)对子系统和属性进行了分析。为便于处理信息,使用了开放式的概念资源管理器软件。分析结果表明,传统技术尽管成本高昂,但在其实施过程中仍将得到保持和发展。事实证明,文献计量分析与应用的正式概念分析方法相结合,有助于对技术类型进行评估,并可作为一种替代方法,用于开展理论研究,将不同的选择方案分组并联系起来,作为评估一组确定属性的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信