LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTS TO COMBINE BUILT HERITAGE PRESERVATION WITH ORGANIZATIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL FIRE PROTECTION

U. Quapp, K. Holschemacher
{"title":"LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTS TO COMBINE BUILT HERITAGE PRESERVATION WITH ORGANIZATIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL FIRE PROTECTION","authors":"U. Quapp, K. Holschemacher","doi":"10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).ldr-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fire safety and built heritage preservation are significant topics in engineering and architecture. Meeting the requirements of both issues in a revaluation or reconstruction project often leads to conflicts that hardly can be resolved to the satisfaction of both interests. Thus, for example, on the one side, installation of fire exit signs or the placement of fire extinguishers affect the historical appearance of built heritage. On the other side, these installations are essential for fire safety. The authors inform about requirements from fire safety and built heritage preservation with a focus on German law. They discuss relevant recent research literature as well as rules and regulations. Furthermore, the authors analyze current court cases, focused on the conflict between organizational and technological fire safety installations and the historical appearance of built heritage. The conclusion is that organizational and technological fire protection installations may negatively affect the historical appearance of built heritage. Nevertheless, in acknowledging the importance of both issues for the society, solutions to balance these interests must and can be found.","PeriodicalId":477265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","volume":"126 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).ldr-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fire safety and built heritage preservation are significant topics in engineering and architecture. Meeting the requirements of both issues in a revaluation or reconstruction project often leads to conflicts that hardly can be resolved to the satisfaction of both interests. Thus, for example, on the one side, installation of fire exit signs or the placement of fire extinguishers affect the historical appearance of built heritage. On the other side, these installations are essential for fire safety. The authors inform about requirements from fire safety and built heritage preservation with a focus on German law. They discuss relevant recent research literature as well as rules and regulations. Furthermore, the authors analyze current court cases, focused on the conflict between organizational and technological fire safety installations and the historical appearance of built heritage. The conclusion is that organizational and technological fire protection installations may negatively affect the historical appearance of built heritage. Nevertheless, in acknowledging the importance of both issues for the society, solutions to balance these interests must and can be found.
从法律角度分析将建筑遗产保护与组织和技术防火相结合的概念
消防安全和建筑遗产保护是工程和建筑领域的重要课题。在重估或重建项目中满足这两个问题的要求往往会导致冲突,而这些冲突很难得到令双方都满意的解决。例如,一方面,安装消防出口标志或放置灭火器会影响建筑遗产的历史外观。另一方面,这些设施对消防安全又是必不可少的。作者以德国法律为重点,介绍了消防安全和建筑遗产保护方面的要求。他们讨论了近期的相关研究文献以及规章制度。此外,作者还分析了当前的法庭案例,重点关注组织和技术消防安全设施与建筑遗产历史外观之间的冲突。结论是,组织性和技术性消防设施可能会对建筑遗产的历史外观造成负面影响。然而,在承认这两个问题对社会的重要性的同时,必须也能够找到平衡这些利益的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信