Efficacy of Ultrasonics Versus XP-endo Finisher for Removal of Intracanal Medications with Two Different Vehicles (An In-Vitro Study)

amany abdelmalek, N. Abdelsalam, Dalia Fayad
{"title":"Efficacy of Ultrasonics Versus XP-endo Finisher for Removal of Intracanal Medications with Two Different Vehicles (An In-Vitro Study)","authors":"amany abdelmalek, N. Abdelsalam, Dalia Fayad","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2024.215537.1181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The ultimate goal of endodontic treatment is to eliminate bacteria from infected root canals. Intracanal medications have been thought to be an important step in reducing microorganisms. Different means were introduced for the removal of intracanal medications, so there is a need to investigate which irrigation method should be used to remove the intracanal medication to achieve a complete coronal and apical seal of the disinfected canals. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of removal of Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) and Double antibiotic paste (DAP) with Propylene glycol (PG) and Glycerol vehicles using Passive Ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and XP-Endo Finisher. Material and methods: 80 single-rooted extracted human teeth were categorized into 4 groups (n=20) based on the intracanal medicament used GroupA1; Ca(OH) 2 + PG GroupA2; Ca(OH) 2 + Glycerol. GroupA3; DAP + PG.GroupA4; DAP + Glycerol. Samples were stored in an incubator for 3 weeks and then subdivided into two groups Subgroup B1; PUI and Subgroup B2; XP-Endo Finisher. Irrigation protocol was NaOCl 2.5% followed by 17% EDTA. Each root half’s picture was photographed using a USB digital microscope.The amount of medication still present in the canal was measured using the NIH image J V1.56 software program. One-way ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Tests were used for the statistical analysis. Results: The difference between vehicles was not significant when all groups were compared as a total using the PUI method and XP-Endo Finisher (p>0.05). However, the differences in the percentage of remaining intracanal medication between vehicles were significant at apical, middle and coronal levels of PUI and also levels of XP-Endo Finisher. Conclusion: None of the irrigation activation methods used could eliminate any of the medications. Both vehicles did not improve the elimination of the medications used from the root canals. Removal of the medications from the apical level was more difficult than the other levels.","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.215537.1181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The ultimate goal of endodontic treatment is to eliminate bacteria from infected root canals. Intracanal medications have been thought to be an important step in reducing microorganisms. Different means were introduced for the removal of intracanal medications, so there is a need to investigate which irrigation method should be used to remove the intracanal medication to achieve a complete coronal and apical seal of the disinfected canals. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of removal of Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) and Double antibiotic paste (DAP) with Propylene glycol (PG) and Glycerol vehicles using Passive Ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and XP-Endo Finisher. Material and methods: 80 single-rooted extracted human teeth were categorized into 4 groups (n=20) based on the intracanal medicament used GroupA1; Ca(OH) 2 + PG GroupA2; Ca(OH) 2 + Glycerol. GroupA3; DAP + PG.GroupA4; DAP + Glycerol. Samples were stored in an incubator for 3 weeks and then subdivided into two groups Subgroup B1; PUI and Subgroup B2; XP-Endo Finisher. Irrigation protocol was NaOCl 2.5% followed by 17% EDTA. Each root half’s picture was photographed using a USB digital microscope.The amount of medication still present in the canal was measured using the NIH image J V1.56 software program. One-way ANOVA and Duncan’s Multiple Range Tests were used for the statistical analysis. Results: The difference between vehicles was not significant when all groups were compared as a total using the PUI method and XP-Endo Finisher (p>0.05). However, the differences in the percentage of remaining intracanal medication between vehicles were significant at apical, middle and coronal levels of PUI and also levels of XP-Endo Finisher. Conclusion: None of the irrigation activation methods used could eliminate any of the medications. Both vehicles did not improve the elimination of the medications used from the root canals. Removal of the medications from the apical level was more difficult than the other levels.
超声波与 XP-endo Finisher 使用两种不同载体清除椎管内药物的功效(体外研究)
简介根管治疗的最终目标是消除受感染根管内的细菌。髓内药物被认为是减少微生物的一个重要步骤。目前已有不同的方法去除根管内药物,因此有必要研究应采用哪种灌洗方法去除根管内药物,以实现消毒后根管的冠状面和根尖面的完全封闭。目的:比较使用被动超声冲洗器(PUI)和 XP-Endo Finisher 使用丙二醇(PG)和甘油载体去除氢氧化钙(Ca(OH)2)和双抗生素糊剂(DAP)的效果。材料和方法:根据所使用的根管内药物,将 80 颗单根拔出的人类牙齿分为 4 组(n=20):A1 组;Ca(OH)2 + PGA2 组;Ca(OH)2 + 甘油。A3组;DAP + PG.A4 组;DAP + 甘油。样品在培养箱中保存 3 周,然后分成两组 B1 组;PUI 和 B2 组;XP-Endo Finisher。灌溉方案为 2.5% NaOCl,然后是 17% EDTA。使用 USB 数码显微镜拍摄每半根的照片,并使用 NIH image J V1.56 软件程序测量根管内残留的药物量。统计分析采用单因素方差分析和邓肯多范围检验。结果当使用 PUI 方法和 XP-Endo Finisher 对所有组别进行总体比较时,不同器械之间的差异并不显著(P>0.05)。但是,在 PUI 法的根尖、中部和冠状水平以及 XP-Endo Finisher 法的水平上,不同载体的根管内剩余药物百分比差异显著。结论:所使用的冲洗激活方法都无法消除任何药物。两种载体都不能提高根管中药物的清除率。从根尖层清除药物比从其他层清除药物更困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信