Lumbar spinal stenosis and surgical decompression affect sleep quality and position in patients. A prospective cross-sectional cohort study

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Luca Papavero , Jana Wilke , Nawar Ali , Kathrin Schawjinski , Annette Holtdirk , Karsten Schoeller
{"title":"Lumbar spinal stenosis and surgical decompression affect sleep quality and position in patients. A prospective cross-sectional cohort study","authors":"Luca Papavero ,&nbsp;Jana Wilke ,&nbsp;Nawar Ali ,&nbsp;Kathrin Schawjinski ,&nbsp;Annette Holtdirk ,&nbsp;Karsten Schoeller","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>It is reasonable to assume that lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects the cauda nerve roots also at night.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Does microsurgical decompression influence sleep quality and position?</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A study nurse interviewed 140 patients scheduled for LSS decompression using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Douleur Neuropathique (DN4), and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Epidemiologic and MRI data were collected along with self-reported rankings of preferred sleep positions (prone, supine, side, and fetal). Follow-up interviews were conducted by telephone six and 18 months after discharge. Statistical analysis was performed using SSPS 24, with significance set at p &lt; 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>132 patients (55% female, mean age 73 years) were evaluated. Preoperatively, 45 (34.1%) patients were classified as good sleepers (GS: PSQI ≤5, range 1–21 (worst)) and 87 (65.9%) as poor sleepers (PS: PSQI ≥6). Decompression surgery reversed the relationship between PS (31.8%) and GS (68.2%, recovered/improved). Protective fetal sleeping position was the most common (≥70%) before and after surgery for both PS and GS. Risk factors for PS included female sex (p = 0.03), obesity (p = 0.03), high NRS back pain score (p = 0.008), and high SSM symptom score (p = 0.004). MRI imaging did not differ between PS and GS.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>LSS had a negative effect on sleep quality, whereas surgical decompression had a positive effect. The protective fetal sleeping position was the preferred position both before and after surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 102785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000419/pdfft?md5=eb7bb88cdbabf2d39cecb571529b55e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000419-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

It is reasonable to assume that lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects the cauda nerve roots also at night.

Research question

Does microsurgical decompression influence sleep quality and position?

Materials and methods

A study nurse interviewed 140 patients scheduled for LSS decompression using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Douleur Neuropathique (DN4), and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Epidemiologic and MRI data were collected along with self-reported rankings of preferred sleep positions (prone, supine, side, and fetal). Follow-up interviews were conducted by telephone six and 18 months after discharge. Statistical analysis was performed using SSPS 24, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

132 patients (55% female, mean age 73 years) were evaluated. Preoperatively, 45 (34.1%) patients were classified as good sleepers (GS: PSQI ≤5, range 1–21 (worst)) and 87 (65.9%) as poor sleepers (PS: PSQI ≥6). Decompression surgery reversed the relationship between PS (31.8%) and GS (68.2%, recovered/improved). Protective fetal sleeping position was the most common (≥70%) before and after surgery for both PS and GS. Risk factors for PS included female sex (p = 0.03), obesity (p = 0.03), high NRS back pain score (p = 0.008), and high SSM symptom score (p = 0.004). MRI imaging did not differ between PS and GS.

Discussion and conclusion

LSS had a negative effect on sleep quality, whereas surgical decompression had a positive effect. The protective fetal sleeping position was the preferred position both before and after surgery.

Abstract Image

腰椎管狭窄症和手术减压会影响患者的睡眠质量和体位。前瞻性横断面队列研究
研究问题显微外科减压术是否会影响睡眠质量和体位? 研究护士使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数 (PSQI)、脊柱狭窄测量 (SSM)、腰腿痛数字评分量表 (NRS)、Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) 和夏尔森合并症指数对 140 名计划接受腰椎管狭窄症减压术的患者进行了访谈。此外,还收集了流行病学数据和核磁共振成像数据,以及自我报告的首选睡眠姿势(俯卧、仰卧、侧卧和胎位)排名。出院后 6 个月和 18 个月通过电话进行了随访。使用 SSPS 24 进行统计分析,显著性设定为 p < 0.05。术前,45 名患者(34.1%)被归类为睡眠良好者(GS:GS:PSQI≤5,范围 1-21(最差)),87 例(65.9%)为睡眠不佳者(PS:PSQI≥6)。减压手术扭转了 PS(31.8%)和 GS(68.2%,恢复/改善)之间的关系。对于 PS 和 GS 而言,手术前后保护性胎儿睡姿最为常见(≥70%)。PS的风险因素包括女性(p = 0.03)、肥胖(p = 0.03)、NRS背痛评分高(p = 0.008)和SSM症状评分高(p = 0.004)。讨论与结论LSS对睡眠质量有负面影响,而手术减压则有正面影响。保护性胎儿睡姿是手术前后的首选体位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信