SHEAR EXPERIMENTS ON STRAIGHT REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS

Eva O. L. Lantsoght, G. Z. Zarate Garnica, Jiandong Lu, Yuguang Yang, Max Hendriks
{"title":"SHEAR EXPERIMENTS ON STRAIGHT REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS","authors":"Eva O. L. Lantsoght, G. Z. Zarate Garnica, Jiandong Lu, Yuguang Yang, Max Hendriks","doi":"10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).str-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the existing bridge stock is aging, assessment of existing bridges becomes increasingly important. In the Netherlands, the shear capacity of reinforced concrete slab bridges is found to be insufficient. In particular, the shear and punching shear capacity of reinforced concrete slab bridges subjected to concentrated loads from the design tandem or truck is subject to discussion, as the shear behavior is situated in between one-way and two-way shear. Currently, an experimental program is being conducted at Delft University of Technology to determine the shear capacity of straight and skewed reinforced concrete slabs under point loads near to the support. This paper presents the results of the 25 tests conducted on six straight slabs of 5m × 2.5 m × 0.3 m subjected to a proof load testing loading protocol. The failure load and modes of the slabs are described in detail. Reinforced concrete slabs under concentrated loads can fail in shear, punching, and flexure, as well as a combination of these failure modes. The results of the experiments are compared to strength predictions obtained by using current design models and current methods for assessment. These experiments demonstrated that the Dutch guidelines, which are based on previous slab experiments, are an improvement as compared to the Eurocode for the assessment of existing reinforced concrete slab bridges. Ultimately, this work provides recommendations for bridge engineers tasked to assess reinforced concrete skewed slab bridges.","PeriodicalId":477265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).str-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the existing bridge stock is aging, assessment of existing bridges becomes increasingly important. In the Netherlands, the shear capacity of reinforced concrete slab bridges is found to be insufficient. In particular, the shear and punching shear capacity of reinforced concrete slab bridges subjected to concentrated loads from the design tandem or truck is subject to discussion, as the shear behavior is situated in between one-way and two-way shear. Currently, an experimental program is being conducted at Delft University of Technology to determine the shear capacity of straight and skewed reinforced concrete slabs under point loads near to the support. This paper presents the results of the 25 tests conducted on six straight slabs of 5m × 2.5 m × 0.3 m subjected to a proof load testing loading protocol. The failure load and modes of the slabs are described in detail. Reinforced concrete slabs under concentrated loads can fail in shear, punching, and flexure, as well as a combination of these failure modes. The results of the experiments are compared to strength predictions obtained by using current design models and current methods for assessment. These experiments demonstrated that the Dutch guidelines, which are based on previous slab experiments, are an improvement as compared to the Eurocode for the assessment of existing reinforced concrete slab bridges. Ultimately, this work provides recommendations for bridge engineers tasked to assess reinforced concrete skewed slab bridges.
钢筋混凝土直板的剪切实验
随着现有桥梁的老化,对现有桥梁的评估变得越来越重要。在荷兰,人们发现钢筋混凝土板桥的抗剪能力不足。特别是钢筋混凝土板桥在承受来自设计串联或卡车的集中荷载时的剪切和冲压剪切能力有待讨论,因为其剪切行为介于单向剪切和双向剪切之间。目前,代尔夫特理工大学正在开展一项实验计划,以确定直线和倾斜钢筋混凝土板在支座附近点荷载作用下的抗剪能力。本文介绍了对六块 5 米 × 2.5 米 × 0.3 米的直板进行 25 次测试的结果,这些板均采用了验证荷载测试加载协议。详细介绍了板的破坏荷载和模式。钢筋混凝土板在集中荷载作用下可能会出现剪切、冲孔和挠曲失效,以及这些失效模式的组合失效。实验结果与使用现行设计模型和现行评估方法得出的强度预测结果进行了比较。这些实验结果表明,在评估现有钢筋混凝土板桥方面,荷兰指南(基于之前的板桥实验)与欧洲规范相比有所改进。最终,这项工作为负责评估钢筋混凝土倾斜板桥的桥梁工程师提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信