COMPARISON BETWEEN SMF AND SPSW STEEL BUILDING FOR MIXED-USE RESIDENCE USING THE AHP METHOD

Diego Hernan Hidalgo, Roberto Alejandro Guevara, Marlon Hernan Navarro
{"title":"COMPARISON BETWEEN SMF AND SPSW STEEL BUILDING FOR MIXED-USE RESIDENCE USING THE AHP METHOD","authors":"Diego Hernan Hidalgo, Roberto Alejandro Guevara, Marlon Hernan Navarro","doi":"10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).str-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this work is to compare the Special Moment Frame (SMF) system and the Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) system using the AHP multi-criteria comparison method with the two Seismic Load Resisting Systems (SFRS). From the linear static analysis, dynamic analysis, and nonlinear static analysis (Pushover), representative characteristics of each Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) are determined. These characteristics include the structure's self-weight, target displacement, floor drifts, and seismic response modification factor (R). As a result, two buildings are obtained with different SFRS that comply with the design of their elements and checks according to the regulatory requirements. After determining the capacity curve of each Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) and assessing the performance level of the buildings, the conclusion is drawn that the Special Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) system is more suitable and advantageous compared to the Special Moment Frame (SMF) system. This preference is due to the SPSW system's ability to provide ductility, which translates into higher energy dissipation capacity, and stiffness, which leads to reduced floor drifts in the building.","PeriodicalId":477265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2024.11(1).str-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this work is to compare the Special Moment Frame (SMF) system and the Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) system using the AHP multi-criteria comparison method with the two Seismic Load Resisting Systems (SFRS). From the linear static analysis, dynamic analysis, and nonlinear static analysis (Pushover), representative characteristics of each Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) are determined. These characteristics include the structure's self-weight, target displacement, floor drifts, and seismic response modification factor (R). As a result, two buildings are obtained with different SFRS that comply with the design of their elements and checks according to the regulatory requirements. After determining the capacity curve of each Seismic Force-Resisting System (SFRS) and assessing the performance level of the buildings, the conclusion is drawn that the Special Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) system is more suitable and advantageous compared to the Special Moment Frame (SMF) system. This preference is due to the SPSW system's ability to provide ductility, which translates into higher energy dissipation capacity, and stiffness, which leads to reduced floor drifts in the building.
采用 AHP 法对用于多功能住宅的 smf 和 spsw 钢结构建筑进行比较
本研究的目的是采用 AHP 多标准比较法,比较特殊力矩框架 (SMF) 系统和钢板剪力墙 (SPSW) 系统与两种抗震加固系统 (SFRS)。通过线性静力分析、动力分析和非线性静力分析(Pushover),确定了每种抗震加固系统(SFRS)的代表性特征。这些特征包括结构自重、目标位移、楼层漂移和地震响应修正系数 (R)。因此,两座建筑物的 SFRS 各不相同,但都符合其构件的设计,并根据法规要求进行了校核。在确定了每种抗震体系的承载力曲线并评估了建筑物的性能水平后,得出的结论是,与特殊弯矩框架(SMF)体系相比,特殊板剪力墙(SPSW)体系更合适、更有利。这是因为特殊板剪力墙系统具有延展性和刚度,延展性可转化为更高的能量消散能力,刚度可减少建筑物的楼板漂移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信