Comparing the efficacy of Leishman–Giemsa Cocktail Stain, Giemsa Stain, and Papanicolaou Stain in Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Comparative Study.

Waqas Iqbal, U. Tariq, Safiya Javed, Surwaich Ali Channa, Aswad Ahmed, Arhama Surwaich
{"title":"Comparing the efficacy of Leishman–Giemsa Cocktail Stain, Giemsa Stain, and Papanicolaou Stain in Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Waqas Iqbal, U. Tariq, Safiya Javed, Surwaich Ali Channa, Aswad Ahmed, Arhama Surwaich","doi":"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.03.7711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To estimate the efficacy of the Leishman Giemsa cocktail stain, Giemsa stain, and Papanicolaou for the screening of potentially malignant lesions by exfoliative cytology. Study Design: Comparative study. Setting: Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, Isra Dental College, Faculty of Dentistry and Allied Sciences Hyderabad, Pakistan. Period: 1st February 2022 to 31st January 2023. Material & Methods: A total of 90 participants were enrolled in the study, 30 subjects of normal healthy individuals were categorized in Group-I and 60 patients with diagnosed potentially malignant lesions (Oral submucous Fibrosis, Oral Lichen Planus, and Leukoplakia) were categorized in Group II. Participants were advised to rinse their mouth with water and the sample was taken by moving a brush clockwise and anti-clockwise over mucosa and the surface of the lesion. Three smears were prepared from each sample, one was fixed with biofix spray and stained with Papanicolaou stain, and other two smears were air-dried and stained with Leishman Giemsa and Giemsa stain. Stained slides were observed under a microscope and the slides were interpreted. Results: In Group-I Leishman Giemsa cocktail stain was highly significant compared to Papanicolaou and Giemsa stain, the mean value of the Leishman Giemsa cytoplasmic stain was 1.16, Papanicolaou was 1.0 and Giemsa was 0.52. Whereas in group II, the mean score of cytoplasmic staining of the Leishman Giemsa cocktail was 1.16, Papanicolaou was 1.10 and Giemsa was 0.67. There was no significant difference found in the mean score of cytoplasmic staining of Group-I and Group II respectively. Conclusion: According to current research study results, the Leishman Giemsa cocktail stain is a better staining technique for the screening of potentially malignant lesions along with the Papanicolaou stain.","PeriodicalId":22991,"journal":{"name":"The professional medical journal","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The professional medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.03.7711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the efficacy of the Leishman Giemsa cocktail stain, Giemsa stain, and Papanicolaou for the screening of potentially malignant lesions by exfoliative cytology. Study Design: Comparative study. Setting: Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, Isra Dental College, Faculty of Dentistry and Allied Sciences Hyderabad, Pakistan. Period: 1st February 2022 to 31st January 2023. Material & Methods: A total of 90 participants were enrolled in the study, 30 subjects of normal healthy individuals were categorized in Group-I and 60 patients with diagnosed potentially malignant lesions (Oral submucous Fibrosis, Oral Lichen Planus, and Leukoplakia) were categorized in Group II. Participants were advised to rinse their mouth with water and the sample was taken by moving a brush clockwise and anti-clockwise over mucosa and the surface of the lesion. Three smears were prepared from each sample, one was fixed with biofix spray and stained with Papanicolaou stain, and other two smears were air-dried and stained with Leishman Giemsa and Giemsa stain. Stained slides were observed under a microscope and the slides were interpreted. Results: In Group-I Leishman Giemsa cocktail stain was highly significant compared to Papanicolaou and Giemsa stain, the mean value of the Leishman Giemsa cytoplasmic stain was 1.16, Papanicolaou was 1.0 and Giemsa was 0.52. Whereas in group II, the mean score of cytoplasmic staining of the Leishman Giemsa cocktail was 1.16, Papanicolaou was 1.10 and Giemsa was 0.67. There was no significant difference found in the mean score of cytoplasmic staining of Group-I and Group II respectively. Conclusion: According to current research study results, the Leishman Giemsa cocktail stain is a better staining technique for the screening of potentially malignant lesions along with the Papanicolaou stain.
比较利什曼-吉氏混合染色法、吉氏染色法和巴氏染色法对潜在恶性疾病的疗效:比较研究。
目的评估利什曼吉氏鸡尾酒染色法、吉氏染色法和巴氏染色法对脱落细胞学筛查潜在恶性病变的效果。研究设计:比较研究。研究地点巴基斯坦海德拉巴伊斯拉牙科学院口腔医学和口腔病理学系。时间: 2022 年 2 月 1 日至 1 月 31 日2022 年 2 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日。材料与方法:共招募了 90 名参与者,其中 30 名正常健康人被归入第一组,60 名确诊为潜在恶性病变(口腔黏膜下纤维化、口腔扁平苔藓和白斑病)的患者被归入第二组。参与者先用水漱口,然后用刷子在粘膜和病变表面顺时针和逆时针方向移动,采集样本。每个样本制备三张涂片,其中一张用生物固定喷雾剂固定并用巴氏染色法染色,另外两张涂片风干后用利什曼-吉氏和吉氏染色法染色。在显微镜下观察染色切片,并对切片进行判读。结果在第一组中,利什曼-吉氏鸡尾酒染色与巴氏染色和吉氏染色相比效果显著,利什曼-吉氏细胞质染色的平均值为 1.16,巴氏染色为 1.0,吉氏染色为 0.52。而在第二组中,Leishman Giemsa 鸡尾酒细胞质染色的平均值为 1.16,Papanicolaou 为 1.10,Giemsa 为 0.67。第一组和第二组的细胞质染色平均得分没有明显差异。结论根据目前的研究结果,利什曼-吉氏鸡尾酒染色法与巴氏染色法相比,是筛查潜在恶性病变的更好的染色技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信