FAIRness of Research Data in the European Humanities Landscape

IF 4.6 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Publications Pub Date : 2024-03-05 DOI:10.3390/publications12010006

Ljiljana Poljak Bilić, Kristina Posavec

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the landscape of research data in the humanities in the European context, delving into their diversity and the challenges of defining and sharing them. It investigates three aspects: the types of data in the humanities, their representation in repositories, and their alignment with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). By reviewing datasets in repositories, this research determines the dominant data types, their openness, licensing, and compliance with the FAIR principles. This research provides important insight into the heterogeneous nature of humanities data, their representation in the repository, and their alignment with FAIR principles, highlighting the need for improved accessibility and reusability to improve the overall quality and utility of humanities research data.

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧洲人文领域研究数据的公平性

本文探讨了欧洲人文科学研究数据的现状，深入研究了它们的多样性以及定义和共享它们所面临的挑战。它从三个方面进行了调查：人文学科数据的类型、它们在资料库中的代表性以及它们是否符合 FAIR 原则（可查找、可访问、可互操作、可重用）。通过审查资料库中的数据集，本研究确定了主要的数据类型、其开放性、许可情况以及是否符合 FAIR 原则。这项研究对人文科学数据的异质性、它们在资源库中的代表性以及它们与 FAIR 原则的一致性提供了重要的见解，突出了改善可访问性和可重用性以提高人文科学研究数据的整体质量和效用的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Publications Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

1.90%

发文量

审稿时长

11 weeks

期刊介绍： The scope of Publications includes: Theory and practice of scholarly communication Digitisation and innovations in scholarly publishing technologies Metadata, infrastructure, and linking the scholarly record Publishing policies and editorial/peer-review workflows Financial models for scholarly publishing Copyright, licensing and legal issues in publishing Research integrity and publication ethics Issues and best practices in the publication of non-traditional research outputs (e.g., data, software/code, protocols, data management plans, grant proposals, etc.) Issues in the transition to open access and open science Inclusion and participation of traditionally excluded actors Language issues in publication processes and products Traditional and alternative models of peer review Traditional and alternative means of assessment and evaluation of research and its impact, including bibliometrics and scientometrics The place of research libraries, scholarly societies, funders and others in scholarly communication.