Comparative Analysis of Osseodensification and Standard Implant Site Preparation Techniques in Low Density Bone

E. A. Levonian, V. A. Badalyan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Osseodensification and Standard Implant Site Preparation Techniques in Low Density Bone","authors":"E. A. Levonian, V. A. Badalyan","doi":"10.52420/2071-5943-2024-23-1-12-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Dental implantation is getting more popular with patients who require total dental rehabilitation. Patients note that possibility of immediate loading based on dental implants is more favorable treatment option due to active social life. Low bone density, often occurred in the maxilla, frequently presents challenges for clinicians to achieve successful implant primary stability for predictable immediate loading.The aim of our study was to increase the efficiency of treatment of patients who require dental implantation in the maxilla.Materials and methods. Twenty-seven patients aged from 27 to 66 years with missing teeth in the alveolar process of maxilla were treated. All patients in this randomized clinical trial were divided into two groups. We used two methods for implant site preparation: the standard technique according to manufacturer’s recommendations in the first group (n = 13) and the Osseodensification technique via Densah drills (n = 14) in the second. All patients were treated by Astra Tech dental implants with the same dimensions (diameter 4 mm, length 9 mm). Immediately after implant placement the data of the frequency-resonance analysis of the implant stability and insertion torque were installed and obtained. Furthermore, a comparison of the operation time was carried out. Clinical evaluation and patient appreciation of pain, edema and hyperemia of the mucosa were evaluated using a questionnaire at 1, 3, 5 and 7 days after surgery. The measurement of the values of the stability quotient of the implants was repeated and carried out after six months.Results. Higher values of implant primary stability (insertion torque and implant stability quotient during surgery) were showed in the osseodensification group (IT — (45,0±5,8), ISQ — (71,8±2,9)) in comparison with standard technique (IT — (27,7±3,8), ISQ — (62,8±3,2)); p < 0,05.Discussion. Osseodensification technique promotes compaction of a low density bone in direct contact with the implant, which leads to higher implant primary stability due to the physical interaction between bone and implant.Conclusion. The obtained results allow us to consider that the osseodensification method is progressive for improving the effectiveness of implantological treatment on maxilla.","PeriodicalId":247511,"journal":{"name":"Ural Medical Journal","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ural Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2024-23-1-12-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Dental implantation is getting more popular with patients who require total dental rehabilitation. Patients note that possibility of immediate loading based on dental implants is more favorable treatment option due to active social life. Low bone density, often occurred in the maxilla, frequently presents challenges for clinicians to achieve successful implant primary stability for predictable immediate loading.The aim of our study was to increase the efficiency of treatment of patients who require dental implantation in the maxilla.Materials and methods. Twenty-seven patients aged from 27 to 66 years with missing teeth in the alveolar process of maxilla were treated. All patients in this randomized clinical trial were divided into two groups. We used two methods for implant site preparation: the standard technique according to manufacturer’s recommendations in the first group (n = 13) and the Osseodensification technique via Densah drills (n = 14) in the second. All patients were treated by Astra Tech dental implants with the same dimensions (diameter 4 mm, length 9 mm). Immediately after implant placement the data of the frequency-resonance analysis of the implant stability and insertion torque were installed and obtained. Furthermore, a comparison of the operation time was carried out. Clinical evaluation and patient appreciation of pain, edema and hyperemia of the mucosa were evaluated using a questionnaire at 1, 3, 5 and 7 days after surgery. The measurement of the values of the stability quotient of the implants was repeated and carried out after six months.Results. Higher values of implant primary stability (insertion torque and implant stability quotient during surgery) were showed in the osseodensification group (IT — (45,0±5,8), ISQ — (71,8±2,9)) in comparison with standard technique (IT — (27,7±3,8), ISQ — (62,8±3,2)); p < 0,05.Discussion. Osseodensification technique promotes compaction of a low density bone in direct contact with the implant, which leads to higher implant primary stability due to the physical interaction between bone and implant.Conclusion. The obtained results allow us to consider that the osseodensification method is progressive for improving the effectiveness of implantological treatment on maxilla.
低密度骨中骨质增生与标准种植体部位准备技术的比较分析
简介种植牙越来越受到需要全面牙齿康复的患者的欢迎。患者指出,由于社交生活活跃,种植体即刻装载的可能性是更有利的治疗选择。我们的研究旨在提高上颌种植牙患者的治疗效率。27名年龄在27至66岁之间的上颌牙槽突缺失牙患者接受了治疗。这项随机临床试验将所有患者分为两组。我们采用两种方法进行种植体部位准备:第一组(13 人)根据制造商的建议采用标准技术,第二组(14 人)通过 Densah 钻采用骨增量技术。所有患者均使用相同尺寸(直径 4 毫米,长度 9 毫米)的 Astra Tech 种植体进行治疗。种植体植入后,立即安装并获取了关于种植体稳定性和插入扭矩的频率共振分析数据。此外,还对手术时间进行了比较。术后 1、3、5 和 7 天,通过问卷对患者的疼痛、水肿和粘膜充血情况进行了临床评估和评价。六个月后,重复测量种植体的稳定性商值。与标准技术(IT - (27,7±3,8),ISQ - (62,8±3,2))相比,骨质增生组(IT - (45,0±5,8),ISQ - (71,8±2,9))的种植体初级稳定性(手术中的插入扭矩和种植体稳定性商数)更高;P < 0.05。骨质增生技术促进了与种植体直接接触的低密度骨的压实,由于骨与种植体之间的物理相互作用,种植体的初期稳定性更高。根据所获得的结果,我们可以认为骨质增生法在提高上颌种植治疗效果方面具有进步意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信